Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
UPDATE: Uncanny Dodge vs. Feint
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Felix" data-source="post: 1079565" data-attributes="member: 3929"><p><em>Felix opens the door to this thread and tosses in a stun grenade</em></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">FOOM</span> </p><p></p><p>Right. Everyone breathe deeply. Count to 10 before posting. Imagine this is a game we're talking about.</p><p></p><p>Ok. </p><p></p><p>The UD description as written with "even if" (and the DMG "regardless of") may be interpreted the way Caliban favors; it <em>also</em> may be interpreted the way Artoomis favors.</p><p></p><p>If anyone disagrees with this statement, this is the part of my post where you move on to the next post.</p><p>.</p><p>.</p><p>.</p><p>Still here? Ok. </p><p></p><p>Is simplicity a reliable way of determining meaning? It is subjective, so, no.</p><p></p><p>Is intent a reliable way of determining meaning? Were it so, Constitutional Law would be the easiest class in Law school ever, so, no.</p><p></p><p>Is syntax, semantics and logical rendering of the sentence a reliable way of determining meaning? One would think so, but this sentence is ambiguous (and you agree with me since you've read this far! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> ), and because it is ambiguous, grammar rules won't provide a clear answer, so, no.</p><p></p><p>What are we left with?</p><p></p><p>Perhaps the hope that an official fiat will come from WotC stating one way or another? Until we have this, until the ambiguity which is the root of the problem is cleared, we will reach no answer but only discover one another's opinions.</p><p></p><p>As for me, I think Uncanny Dodge is a representation of a preternatural awareness on the part of the character. I think it takes a reduction of mobility to void this awareness. I think that this interpretation of the rules is a valid one. I think I will disregard Skip's ruling because I dislike it for flavor reasons. I think it would be interesting to have professional logicians reduce the UD description to a mathmatical equation.</p><p></p><p>I think some folks here need to shake hands and make up. That, or settle your dispute outside. One or the other.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Felix, post: 1079565, member: 3929"] [i]Felix opens the door to this thread and tosses in a stun grenade[/i] [SIZE=3]FOOM[/SIZE] Right. Everyone breathe deeply. Count to 10 before posting. Imagine this is a game we're talking about. Ok. The UD description as written with "even if" (and the DMG "regardless of") may be interpreted the way Caliban favors; it [i]also[/i] may be interpreted the way Artoomis favors. If anyone disagrees with this statement, this is the part of my post where you move on to the next post. . . . Still here? Ok. Is simplicity a reliable way of determining meaning? It is subjective, so, no. Is intent a reliable way of determining meaning? Were it so, Constitutional Law would be the easiest class in Law school ever, so, no. Is syntax, semantics and logical rendering of the sentence a reliable way of determining meaning? One would think so, but this sentence is ambiguous (and you agree with me since you've read this far! :D ), and because it is ambiguous, grammar rules won't provide a clear answer, so, no. What are we left with? Perhaps the hope that an official fiat will come from WotC stating one way or another? Until we have this, until the ambiguity which is the root of the problem is cleared, we will reach no answer but only discover one another's opinions. As for me, I think Uncanny Dodge is a representation of a preternatural awareness on the part of the character. I think it takes a reduction of mobility to void this awareness. I think that this interpretation of the rules is a valid one. I think I will disregard Skip's ruling because I dislike it for flavor reasons. I think it would be interesting to have professional logicians reduce the UD description to a mathmatical equation. I think some folks here need to shake hands and make up. That, or settle your dispute outside. One or the other. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
UPDATE: Uncanny Dodge vs. Feint
Top