Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[UPDATED] Here's Mike Mearls' New D&D 5E Initiative System
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Morrus" data-source="post: 7715529" data-attributes="member: 1"><p>In <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?4118-Mike-Mearls-D-D-AMA-Summary-Rangers-Initiative-WotC-Staff-Levels-Fave-Pizza" target="_blank">his AMA yesterday</a>, WotC's Mike Mearls frequently referenced his dislike for D&D's initiative system, and mentioned that he was using a new initiative system in his own games. He later briefly explained what that was: [HQ]"Roll each round. D4 = ranged, d8 = melee, d12 = spell, d6 = anything else, +d8 to swap gear, +d8 for bonus action, low goes 1st. Oh, and +d6 to move and do something ... adds tension, speeds up resolution. So far in play has been faster and makes fights more intense."[/HQ] That's the short version; there's likely more to it. Mearls mentioned briefly that he might trial it in <em>Unearthed Arcana</em> at some point to see what sort of reaction it gets.[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]</p><p></p><p>In his AMA, Mearls indicated it was <em>cyclic</em> initiative he didn't like ([HQ]"Cyclical initiative - too predictable"[/HQ]), which the above doesn't address at all (it merely changes the die rolls). Presumably there's more to the system than that quick couple of sentences up there, and it sounds like initiative is rolled every round. So if your initiative is based on your action, presumably you declare your action before rolling initiative (as opposed to declaring your action when your initiative comes around).</p><p></p><p>_____</p><p></p><p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> I asked Mearls a couple of quick questions. He commented that it [HQ]"lets ranged guys shoot before melee closes, spellcasters need to be shielded"[/HQ]. He also mentioned that he [HQ]"tinkered with using your weapon's damage die as your roll, but too inflexible, not sure it's worth it"[/HQ].</p><p></p><p>How is this implemented in-game? [HQ]"Roll each round, count starts again at 1. Requires end of turn stuff to swap to end of round, since it's not static. In play I've called out numbers - Any 1s, 2s, etc, then just letting every PC go once monsters are done"[/HQ]. You announce your action at the beginning of the round; you only need to [HQ]"commit to the action type - you're not picking specific targets or a specific spell, for instance."[/HQ]</p><p></p><p>Dexterity does NOT adjust INITIATIVE. Mearls comments that [HQ]"Dex is already so good, i don't miss it".[/HQ]</p><p></p><p>So what's the main benefit of the system? [HQ]"Big benefit is that it encourages group to make a plan, then implement it. Group sees issue of the round and acts around it. I also think it adds a nice flow to combat - each round is a sequence. Plan, resolve, act, encourages group cohesion. Resolution is also faster - each player knows what to do; you don't need to pick spells ahead of acting, but groups so far have planned them."[/HQ]</p><p style="text-align: center"></p> <p style="text-align: center"></p> <p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]111050[/ATTACH]</p> <p style="text-align: center">Picture from ThinkGeek</p> <p style="text-align: center"><span style="color: #FFFFFF"><span style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'"><strong>SaveSave</strong></span></span></p> <p style="text-align: center"><span style="color: #FFFFFF"><span style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'"><strong>SaveSaveSaveSaveSaveSave</strong></span></span></p> <p style="text-align: center"><span style="color: #FFFFFF"><span style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'"><strong>SaveSave</strong></span></span></p> <p style="text-align: center"><span style="color: #FFFFFF"><span style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'"><strong>SaveSave</strong></span></span></p> <p style="text-align: center"><span style="color: #FFFFFF"><span style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'"><strong>SaveSave</strong></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Morrus, post: 7715529, member: 1"] In [URL='http://www.enworld.org/forum/content.php?4118-Mike-Mearls-D-D-AMA-Summary-Rangers-Initiative-WotC-Staff-Levels-Fave-Pizza']his AMA yesterday[/URL], WotC's Mike Mearls frequently referenced his dislike for D&D's initiative system, and mentioned that he was using a new initiative system in his own games. He later briefly explained what that was: [HQ]"Roll each round. D4 = ranged, d8 = melee, d12 = spell, d6 = anything else, +d8 to swap gear, +d8 for bonus action, low goes 1st. Oh, and +d6 to move and do something ... adds tension, speeds up resolution. So far in play has been faster and makes fights more intense."[/HQ] That's the short version; there's likely more to it. Mearls mentioned briefly that he might trial it in [I]Unearthed Arcana[/I] at some point to see what sort of reaction it gets.[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK] In his AMA, Mearls indicated it was [I]cyclic[/I] initiative he didn't like ([HQ]"Cyclical initiative - too predictable"[/HQ]), which the above doesn't address at all (it merely changes the die rolls). Presumably there's more to the system than that quick couple of sentences up there, and it sounds like initiative is rolled every round. So if your initiative is based on your action, presumably you declare your action before rolling initiative (as opposed to declaring your action when your initiative comes around). _____ [B]UPDATE:[/B] I asked Mearls a couple of quick questions. He commented that it [HQ]"lets ranged guys shoot before melee closes, spellcasters need to be shielded"[/HQ]. He also mentioned that he [HQ]"tinkered with using your weapon's damage die as your roll, but too inflexible, not sure it's worth it"[/HQ]. How is this implemented in-game? [HQ]"Roll each round, count starts again at 1. Requires end of turn stuff to swap to end of round, since it's not static. In play I've called out numbers - Any 1s, 2s, etc, then just letting every PC go once monsters are done"[/HQ]. You announce your action at the beginning of the round; you only need to [HQ]"commit to the action type - you're not picking specific targets or a specific spell, for instance."[/HQ] Dexterity does NOT adjust INITIATIVE. Mearls comments that [HQ]"Dex is already so good, i don't miss it".[/HQ] So what's the main benefit of the system? [HQ]"Big benefit is that it encourages group to make a plan, then implement it. Group sees issue of the round and acts around it. I also think it adds a nice flow to combat - each round is a sequence. Plan, resolve, act, encourages group cohesion. Resolution is also faster - each player knows what to do; you don't need to pick spells ahead of acting, but groups so far have planned them."[/HQ] [CENTER] [ATTACH type="full" alt="20b8_critical_hit_d20_rug.jpg"]111050[/ATTACH] Picture from ThinkGeek [COLOR=#FFFFFF][FONT=Helvetica Neue][B]SaveSave SaveSaveSaveSaveSaveSave SaveSave SaveSave SaveSave[/B][/FONT][/COLOR][/CENTER] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[UPDATED] Here's Mike Mearls' New D&D 5E Initiative System
Top