Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[UPDATED] WotC To Close Forums - Including D&D and M:tG (aka "Welcome New Forum Members to EN World!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JohnLynch" data-source="post: 7681218" data-attributes="member: 6749563"><p>That would make sense, except they're keeping the website. And if WotC are truly so worried about the bottom dollar that the meager savings they make by <strong>deleting</strong> the content instead of marking it as read only (and to be honest, I doubt there are any actual savings) then I truly wonder how much of a success 5th edition truly was. Now given I do believe it was a success, I do not think they did this in an effort to save costs.</p><p></p><p>Directing energy and resources to social media in place of discussion forums makes sense. I do not know any tangible resources that can actually be directed to social media as a result of having deleted (instead of marking as read only) the discussion forums. As you said, we're talking pennies here, so this reasoning is actually not valid when discussing why would WotC choose to <strong>delete</strong> the forums (it is valid for the question of why would WotC not want to continue having the forums active).</p><p></p><p>WotC would have likely not liked the answers they would have received from such a survey so it makes perfect sense not to make the survey. They can probably guess that most people would advocate for a read only forum (it's also easy to do. Remove the login, register and forgot my password links) and clearly they didn't want to do that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JohnLynch, post: 7681218, member: 6749563"] That would make sense, except they're keeping the website. And if WotC are truly so worried about the bottom dollar that the meager savings they make by [B]deleting[/B] the content instead of marking it as read only (and to be honest, I doubt there are any actual savings) then I truly wonder how much of a success 5th edition truly was. Now given I do believe it was a success, I do not think they did this in an effort to save costs. Directing energy and resources to social media in place of discussion forums makes sense. I do not know any tangible resources that can actually be directed to social media as a result of having deleted (instead of marking as read only) the discussion forums. As you said, we're talking pennies here, so this reasoning is actually not valid when discussing why would WotC choose to [B]delete[/B] the forums (it is valid for the question of why would WotC not want to continue having the forums active). WotC would have likely not liked the answers they would have received from such a survey so it makes perfect sense not to make the survey. They can probably guess that most people would advocate for a read only forum (it's also easy to do. Remove the login, register and forgot my password links) and clearly they didn't want to do that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[UPDATED] WotC To Close Forums - Including D&D and M:tG (aka "Welcome New Forum Members to EN World!
Top