Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Urbis - Should I follow the GSL, or make the setting system-independent?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jürgen Hubert" data-source="post: 4665399" data-attributes="member: 7177"><p>The <a href="http://urbis.wikidot.com/" target="_blank">Urbis Wiki</a> gradually nears a state of, if not completion, then at least comprehensiveness that allows others to use the setting. The regions are getting increasingly detailed. Maps have been added that allow the readers to understand the scope and geographical detail. More and more illustrations and art are being uploaded.</p><p></p><p>But I have to make a decision in what direction I want to take the setting now.</p><p></p><p>Urbis has always been centered on D&D assumptions - essentially, I wanted to take the common tropes of D&D and build a setting around them that not only makes sense, but pushes them to their logical conclusions in the form of a magical industrial revolution. This goal has not changed with the arrival of D&D 4E - an edition which I like, and whose assumptions and elements (such as the new races) I have already partially integrated.</p><p></p><p>Yet I'm not sure whether I should trust the GSL, which seems very restrictive and might interfere with future publishing plans. So now I'm wondering whether I turn the Urbis Wiki - and with it, the "public" development of the setting that is freely downloadable by everyone - away from something that obviously refers to D&D 4E into a more "system-less" setting. That would involve some significant name changes with some aspects of the setting - elements which only appear in D&D would have to be altered to make them more universal. While common fantasy tropes such as vampires, ghouls, etc. could remain, I would, for example, rename "eladrin" into "high elves", "dragonborn" into "dragonkin", alter the color schemes for dragons, and remove references to many of the more obscure creatures of D&D canon.</p><p></p><p>The downside of this might be the alienation of many D&D fans, who might be annoyed by the alterations and confused by the use of different names for what are essentially the same creatures.</p><p></p><p>So, what are your thoughts? Should I stick to all the D&D-isms, or remove them and remake the setting into something more universal and distanced from D&D?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jürgen Hubert, post: 4665399, member: 7177"] The [url=http://urbis.wikidot.com/]Urbis Wiki[/url] gradually nears a state of, if not completion, then at least comprehensiveness that allows others to use the setting. The regions are getting increasingly detailed. Maps have been added that allow the readers to understand the scope and geographical detail. More and more illustrations and art are being uploaded. But I have to make a decision in what direction I want to take the setting now. Urbis has always been centered on D&D assumptions - essentially, I wanted to take the common tropes of D&D and build a setting around them that not only makes sense, but pushes them to their logical conclusions in the form of a magical industrial revolution. This goal has not changed with the arrival of D&D 4E - an edition which I like, and whose assumptions and elements (such as the new races) I have already partially integrated. Yet I'm not sure whether I should trust the GSL, which seems very restrictive and might interfere with future publishing plans. So now I'm wondering whether I turn the Urbis Wiki - and with it, the "public" development of the setting that is freely downloadable by everyone - away from something that obviously refers to D&D 4E into a more "system-less" setting. That would involve some significant name changes with some aspects of the setting - elements which only appear in D&D would have to be altered to make them more universal. While common fantasy tropes such as vampires, ghouls, etc. could remain, I would, for example, rename "eladrin" into "high elves", "dragonborn" into "dragonkin", alter the color schemes for dragons, and remove references to many of the more obscure creatures of D&D canon. The downside of this might be the alienation of many D&D fans, who might be annoyed by the alterations and confused by the use of different names for what are essentially the same creatures. So, what are your thoughts? Should I stick to all the D&D-isms, or remove them and remake the setting into something more universal and distanced from D&D? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Urbis - Should I follow the GSL, or make the setting system-independent?
Top