Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Urbis] Should I include the Deities and Demigods material?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jürgen Hubert" data-source="post: 3003131" data-attributes="member: 7177"><p>You might have heard of <a href="http://juergen.the-huberts.net/dnd/urbis/" target="_blank">Urbis</a>, a small setting which I am currently developing for eventual publication. And currently I need to make a decision about the future development of the setting.</p><p></p><p>It has always been my intention to base Urbis on the SRD, and no other third party material - with only small additions written by myself. I didn't want to clutter the setting with too much additional rules complexity - in my humble opinion, d20 has far too much of that already - and I also wanted to see what I could do with <em>just</em> the SRD, by working out all the implication of these rules and trying to create an exiting and novel world around them.</p><p></p><p>Of course, the SRD represents more than just the D&D 3.5 Core Rules. For example, the complete rules for psionics are also in it. But unlike the Core Rules, not everyone could be expected to have the Expanded Psionics Handbook, and I still wanted to make the setting accessible to them. So I compromised by saying that psionics are almost non-existent amoung the standard player character races for hereditary reasons - those few that do exist usually have some sort of tainted ancestry, their blood mixed with a decidedly <em>non</em>-human race. And the only major psionic-using culture is on the fringe of the map, so game masters can feel free to ignore psionics in their campaign entirely without missing out on too much of the setting.</p><p></p><p>However, I've just discovered that material from the "Deities and Demigods" supplement <a href="http://www.systemreferencedocuments.org/35/sovelior_sage/divine.html" target="_blank">has made it into the SRD</a>. And as far as I am aware, that book is far less common in gaming libraries than even the XPH.</p><p></p><p>Well, the inherent abilities of deities and their avatars aren't an issue - Urbis is not a world where the gods are in the habit of stomping across the landscape (and indeed, the very existence of some of them is in doubt). But other aspects - the feats, spells, and especially the new domains - would have to be integrated into the descriptions of NPCs and the deities who grant those spells and domains.</p><p></p><p>So now I have to ask myself - and you - whether to include this material. Would the setting benefit from their inclusion? Or would it decrease its accessibility?</p><p></p><p>Your thoughts, please.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jürgen Hubert, post: 3003131, member: 7177"] You might have heard of [URL=http://juergen.the-huberts.net/dnd/urbis/]Urbis[/URL], a small setting which I am currently developing for eventual publication. And currently I need to make a decision about the future development of the setting. It has always been my intention to base Urbis on the SRD, and no other third party material - with only small additions written by myself. I didn't want to clutter the setting with too much additional rules complexity - in my humble opinion, d20 has far too much of that already - and I also wanted to see what I could do with [i]just[/i] the SRD, by working out all the implication of these rules and trying to create an exiting and novel world around them. Of course, the SRD represents more than just the D&D 3.5 Core Rules. For example, the complete rules for psionics are also in it. But unlike the Core Rules, not everyone could be expected to have the Expanded Psionics Handbook, and I still wanted to make the setting accessible to them. So I compromised by saying that psionics are almost non-existent amoung the standard player character races for hereditary reasons - those few that do exist usually have some sort of tainted ancestry, their blood mixed with a decidedly [i]non[/i]-human race. And the only major psionic-using culture is on the fringe of the map, so game masters can feel free to ignore psionics in their campaign entirely without missing out on too much of the setting. However, I've just discovered that material from the "Deities and Demigods" supplement [URL=http://www.systemreferencedocuments.org/35/sovelior_sage/divine.html]has made it into the SRD[/URL]. And as far as I am aware, that book is far less common in gaming libraries than even the XPH. Well, the inherent abilities of deities and their avatars aren't an issue - Urbis is not a world where the gods are in the habit of stomping across the landscape (and indeed, the very existence of some of them is in doubt). But other aspects - the feats, spells, and especially the new domains - would have to be integrated into the descriptions of NPCs and the deities who grant those spells and domains. So now I have to ask myself - and you - whether to include this material. Would the setting benefit from their inclusion? Or would it decrease its accessibility? Your thoughts, please. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Urbis] Should I include the Deities and Demigods material?
Top