Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Vraille Darkfang" data-source="post: 2629625" data-attributes="member: 16989">Ummm.&nbsp; The door is in front of him.&nbsp; He sort of DOES possess it.&nbsp; Unless you want to say he has to Physically OWN it.This would make it impossible to activate a Gate/Portal the party comes across, as the rogue doesn't POSSESS it. The guy who built it does.What of a magical door that only allows gnomes to pass?&nbsp; No UMD roll to emulate a gnome as he doesn't POSSESS the door?If the rogue grapples with a wizard &amp; graps a wand upon the wizard, can he UMD on it?&nbsp; IF both are holding on to it, who has possession.&nbsp; One? Both? Niether?&nbsp; 50%?&nbsp; Dischage at half effect?You'll want to make sure your players now how you define posession.&nbsp; Otherwise they might get ticked off when they realize they can only activate items the own.No problem with it, just possession is a word with a lot of subtle connotations.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Vraille Darkfang, post: 2629625, member: 16989"] Ummm. The door is in front of him. He sort of DOES possess it. Unless you want to say he has to Physically OWN it. This would make it impossible to activate a Gate/Portal the party comes across, as the rogue doesn't POSSESS it. The guy who built it does. What of a magical door that only allows gnomes to pass? No UMD roll to emulate a gnome as he doesn't POSSESS the door? If the rogue grapples with a wizard & graps a wand upon the wizard, can he UMD on it? IF both are holding on to it, who has possession. One? Both? Niether? 50%? Dischage at half effect? You'll want to make sure your players now how you define posession. Otherwise they might get ticked off when they realize they can only activate items the own. No problem with it, just possession is a word with a lot of subtle connotations. [/QUOTE]

Verification