Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Using a Staff with Use Magic Device
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jgsugden" data-source="post: 1369931" data-attributes="member: 2629"><p>UMD is poorly written. </p><p></p><p>I've seen players argue that they can use three UMD checks when activating a staff: The first (activate a wand) determines whether the staff operates (DC20). The second (emulate class ability) determines their caster level (UMD check - 20). The third (emulate an ability score) determines their effective ability score (UMD - 15). So, a 20th level rogue with a UMD of 23 ranks, a 26 charisma (+8), skill focus: UMD (+3) and Magical Aptitude (+2) has a total UMD of 36. When activating a staff, he automatically makes the initial check, has an average caster level of 26.5 and an effective attribute of 31.5 - Or +10 to the DC of the spell and an effective caster level 6 or 7 higher than the party wizard or cleric. If you start going into epic levels (with epic skill focus), you can get ridiculous effective caster levels 15 to 20 levels above the caster levels of other PCs of equivalent level and DCs for spells that leap up into the 40s at level 21. A 21st level rogue with a UMD of +47 could hit a foe with a hold monster with a caster level of roughly 38 (negating SR less than 39) and a DC of roughly 31.</p><p></p><p>I urge DMs to use a restrained view of UMD if you have a PC trying to max it out - at the minimum, limit caster levels created by UMD to the PC's total character level and limit the effective ability score to something like (15 + 1 per 3 character levels). In some eyes, this will take <strong>house rules</strong>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jgsugden, post: 1369931, member: 2629"] UMD is poorly written. I've seen players argue that they can use three UMD checks when activating a staff: The first (activate a wand) determines whether the staff operates (DC20). The second (emulate class ability) determines their caster level (UMD check - 20). The third (emulate an ability score) determines their effective ability score (UMD - 15). So, a 20th level rogue with a UMD of 23 ranks, a 26 charisma (+8), skill focus: UMD (+3) and Magical Aptitude (+2) has a total UMD of 36. When activating a staff, he automatically makes the initial check, has an average caster level of 26.5 and an effective attribute of 31.5 - Or +10 to the DC of the spell and an effective caster level 6 or 7 higher than the party wizard or cleric. If you start going into epic levels (with epic skill focus), you can get ridiculous effective caster levels 15 to 20 levels above the caster levels of other PCs of equivalent level and DCs for spells that leap up into the 40s at level 21. A 21st level rogue with a UMD of +47 could hit a foe with a hold monster with a caster level of roughly 38 (negating SR less than 39) and a DC of roughly 31. I urge DMs to use a restrained view of UMD if you have a PC trying to max it out - at the minimum, limit caster levels created by UMD to the PC's total character level and limit the effective ability score to something like (15 + 1 per 3 character levels). In some eyes, this will take [b]house rules[/b]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Using a Staff with Use Magic Device
Top