Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Using charisma to determine DC for all Enchantment school spells
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zogg" data-source="post: 923119" data-attributes="member: 12133"><p>I'm going to have to side with Dragon Child here. Remember guys, this feat is focused on only 1 school of magic and only greatly benefits wizards or clerics with an extremely high charisma score and a mediocre INT/WIS. I would hardly call that unbalancing.</p><p></p><p>The reason I would take it is because my cleric of Sune (CHA 18, WIS 16) can, as a charm domain ability, raise her CHA by 4 for 1 minute each day. This would give her an effective CHA of 22 - which would give her Enchantment spells a MUCH better DC than a 16 WIS would. It would be nice if her Enchantment DCs could reap the benefit. That's all I'm asking. </p><p></p><p>Let's look at what this feat does for her in number terms for a 16 WIS and 18 CHA cleric:</p><p></p><p>Hold Person (2nd level spell)</p><p></p><p>-No feat:</p><p> DC = 10+2(spell level)+3(WIS) = 15 DC</p><p></p><p>-Innate Charmer Feat</p><p> DC= 10+2(spell level)+4(CHA)+1(feat) = 17 DC</p><p></p><p>-Charm domain ability and Innate Charmer Feat </p><p>*remember this will only be for 1 minute each day*</p><p> DC= 10+2(spell level)+4(CHA) +1(feat)+2(domain ability) = 19DC</p><p></p><p>So NORMALLY there will be a +2 DC difference - making it a questionable choice when compared to the regular Spell Focus feat. However, for those clerics/wizards that either a) have a high charisma or b) are able to really boost up their charisma (perhaps even by a potion of charisma) this feat CAN mean the difference between a held enemy and one that can decapitate you. </p><p></p><p>So this feat CAN be valuable, but it's hardly unbalancing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zogg, post: 923119, member: 12133"] I'm going to have to side with Dragon Child here. Remember guys, this feat is focused on only 1 school of magic and only greatly benefits wizards or clerics with an extremely high charisma score and a mediocre INT/WIS. I would hardly call that unbalancing. The reason I would take it is because my cleric of Sune (CHA 18, WIS 16) can, as a charm domain ability, raise her CHA by 4 for 1 minute each day. This would give her an effective CHA of 22 - which would give her Enchantment spells a MUCH better DC than a 16 WIS would. It would be nice if her Enchantment DCs could reap the benefit. That's all I'm asking. Let's look at what this feat does for her in number terms for a 16 WIS and 18 CHA cleric: Hold Person (2nd level spell) -No feat: DC = 10+2(spell level)+3(WIS) = 15 DC -Innate Charmer Feat DC= 10+2(spell level)+4(CHA)+1(feat) = 17 DC -Charm domain ability and Innate Charmer Feat *remember this will only be for 1 minute each day* DC= 10+2(spell level)+4(CHA) +1(feat)+2(domain ability) = 19DC So NORMALLY there will be a +2 DC difference - making it a questionable choice when compared to the regular Spell Focus feat. However, for those clerics/wizards that either a) have a high charisma or b) are able to really boost up their charisma (perhaps even by a potion of charisma) this feat CAN mean the difference between a held enemy and one that can decapitate you. So this feat CAN be valuable, but it's hardly unbalancing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Using charisma to determine DC for all Enchantment school spells
Top