Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Oofta" data-source="post: 8239702" data-attributes="member: 6801845">Now I'm confused.&nbsp; Your response toYou respondedWhat do you mean?The spell states what ends concentration and how.&nbsp; They also state that at DM's discretion you can ask for a DC 10 concentration check.&nbsp; I would rule that telling someone trained in combat to &quot;panic&quot; would not work*, but if I did I would fall back on the DC 10 concentration check.&nbsp; Because I run spells as written.As far as why I stop arguing, what's the point?&nbsp; You run your game any way you want.&nbsp; If you were my DM I'd disagree with you on this, but it would be your table, your rule.&nbsp; I see no value in getting into pissing contests.&nbsp; You've clearly explained what you think, as have I.&nbsp; What more is there to say?*EDIT: my ruling would be that they would pretend to panic on their turn, they would not actually panic.&nbsp; Command is controls the target's action, emotional state is not an action.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Oofta, post: 8239702, member: 6801845"] Now I'm confused. Your response to You responded What do you mean? The spell states what ends concentration and how. They also state that at DM's discretion you can ask for a DC 10 concentration check. I would rule that telling someone trained in combat to "panic" would not work*, but if I did I would fall back on the DC 10 concentration check. Because I run spells as written. As far as why I stop arguing, what's the point? You run your game any way you want. If you were my DM I'd disagree with you on this, but it would be your table, your rule. I see no value in getting into pissing contests. You've clearly explained what you think, as have I. What more is there to say? [I]*EDIT: my ruling would be that they would pretend to panic on their turn, they would not actually panic. Command is controls the target's action, emotional state is not an action.[/I] [/QUOTE]

Verification