Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Using "D&D 2024" instead of "5e24"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9231375" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>As others have said, I am going to call it what it is: 5.5e. A revision, which will replace things <em>officially</em> (read: for organized play), but which will be effectively backwards-compatible with pretty much everything that came before. There's little to no problem playing 3e content in 3.5e stuff, and adventures written for either one will require little if any change regardless of the rules you choose to use. Much of it is simply rejiggering the math to patch up the holes they've found (e.g., giving the 5.5e Warlock a 1/day recharge of their spell slots because people don't short rest often enough.) There are some winners and some losers, some cool things and some annoyances. So it goes.</p><p></p><p>They're just bending over backwards to prevent the kind of backlash that happened with the last time they revised an edition rather than coming out with a new one. I find this pretense rather annoying and would prefer that they just be honest with people. Of course, the cynic in my soul recognizes that such honesty would backfire, but its optimist counterpart questions exactly how inevitable that is, given how much the D&D fanbase has changed over the past 20 years.</p><p></p><p>For real though:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">It's changing a bunch of spells, feats, and a handful of common/general mechanics (e.g. weapons), but nothing ground-breaking</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">It's altering the mechanics of several core classes to improve them</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">It's rewriting some subclasses to improve them (read: to make them suck less in most cases, e.g. Berserker, Champion, and Beast Master)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">It's going to change presentation and style, but not much about the math itself, other than a few back-end tweaks</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Most content from before will be usable without any adaptation. A few things, like backgrounds, will need adjustment.</li> </ul><p>This is exactly what 3.5e was. A revision that preserved the overall rules structure, but made tweaks and changes within it to fix what things could be fixed. It <em>is</em> 5.5e. But calling it that is too much of a risk, so we're going to get silly naming conventions instead.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9231375, member: 6790260"] As others have said, I am going to call it what it is: 5.5e. A revision, which will replace things [I]officially[/I] (read: for organized play), but which will be effectively backwards-compatible with pretty much everything that came before. There's little to no problem playing 3e content in 3.5e stuff, and adventures written for either one will require little if any change regardless of the rules you choose to use. Much of it is simply rejiggering the math to patch up the holes they've found (e.g., giving the 5.5e Warlock a 1/day recharge of their spell slots because people don't short rest often enough.) There are some winners and some losers, some cool things and some annoyances. So it goes. They're just bending over backwards to prevent the kind of backlash that happened with the last time they revised an edition rather than coming out with a new one. I find this pretense rather annoying and would prefer that they just be honest with people. Of course, the cynic in my soul recognizes that such honesty would backfire, but its optimist counterpart questions exactly how inevitable that is, given how much the D&D fanbase has changed over the past 20 years. For real though: [LIST] [*]It's changing a bunch of spells, feats, and a handful of common/general mechanics (e.g. weapons), but nothing ground-breaking [*]It's altering the mechanics of several core classes to improve them [*]It's rewriting some subclasses to improve them (read: to make them suck less in most cases, e.g. Berserker, Champion, and Beast Master) [*]It's going to change presentation and style, but not much about the math itself, other than a few back-end tweaks [*]Most content from before will be usable without any adaptation. A few things, like backgrounds, will need adjustment. [/LIST] This is exactly what 3.5e was. A revision that preserved the overall rules structure, but made tweaks and changes within it to fix what things could be fixed. It [I]is[/I] 5.5e. But calling it that is too much of a risk, so we're going to get silly naming conventions instead. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Using "D&D 2024" instead of "5e24"
Top