Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Using general Feats when your ability is already 20
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Flights of Fancy" data-source="post: 9677385" data-attributes="member: 7037975"><p>I'll chime in on the discussion of super-high ability scores and a PC stealing most of the spotlight:</p><p></p><p>It doesn't happen much in my experience. Having one or even two 20s will give a PC an edge, no doubt, but the game is too complex and too swingy with the d20 for that to account for any sort of long running, consistantly felt edge, <strong>with the SOLE exception possibly being a CON 20.</strong></p><p></p><p>CON 20 can make things feel very off-balance with other PCs have CONs 14 or 12. In one game with had a Barbarian with STR and CON 20... so great offense numbers of course but also stellar durability! Or other martial, a Paladin, had STR 16 and CHA 20 IIRC, so was decent at offense (great when he nova'd!) and had a great AC due to plate armor, but his durability with CON 14 just couldn't match the Barbarian. Consequently, he felt like the proverbal glass-cannon to the player.</p><p></p><p>Meanwhile, the DM could <em>never</em> get the barbarian down! To make the issue worse, he even took the Tough feat so by the end of the game (level 12), he had something like 180 hp and good AC around 19 IIRC. Meanwhile, the Paladin had about 100 hp or a bit more. So, even though he had a better AC (22 I think?), he just couldn't tank enough to front-line like the Barbarian--especially when you add in the damage resistance due to rage!</p><p></p><p>Overall, their abilities were about the same average, because the barbarian was low-average in most of the stuff, but two 20's; while the Paladin had generally higher scores, but just the CHA 20 at the end.</p><p></p><p>So, despite the barbarian having STR 20 and the paladin STR 16, offensively they were well matched due to smites. But that second 20 in CON just made the barbarian impossible to bring down.</p><p></p><p>Other party members felt it, too, because creatures would down them more easily, while the barbarian was still up in the end.</p><p></p><p>CON is the only real score where I've seen this sort of issue come up, personally.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Flights of Fancy, post: 9677385, member: 7037975"] I'll chime in on the discussion of super-high ability scores and a PC stealing most of the spotlight: It doesn't happen much in my experience. Having one or even two 20s will give a PC an edge, no doubt, but the game is too complex and too swingy with the d20 for that to account for any sort of long running, consistantly felt edge, [B]with the SOLE exception possibly being a CON 20.[/B] CON 20 can make things feel very off-balance with other PCs have CONs 14 or 12. In one game with had a Barbarian with STR and CON 20... so great offense numbers of course but also stellar durability! Or other martial, a Paladin, had STR 16 and CHA 20 IIRC, so was decent at offense (great when he nova'd!) and had a great AC due to plate armor, but his durability with CON 14 just couldn't match the Barbarian. Consequently, he felt like the proverbal glass-cannon to the player. Meanwhile, the DM could [I]never[/I] get the barbarian down! To make the issue worse, he even took the Tough feat so by the end of the game (level 12), he had something like 180 hp and good AC around 19 IIRC. Meanwhile, the Paladin had about 100 hp or a bit more. So, even though he had a better AC (22 I think?), he just couldn't tank enough to front-line like the Barbarian--especially when you add in the damage resistance due to rage! Overall, their abilities were about the same average, because the barbarian was low-average in most of the stuff, but two 20's; while the Paladin had generally higher scores, but just the CHA 20 at the end. So, despite the barbarian having STR 20 and the paladin STR 16, offensively they were well matched due to smites. But that second 20 in CON just made the barbarian impossible to bring down. Other party members felt it, too, because creatures would down them more easily, while the barbarian was still up in the end. CON is the only real score where I've seen this sort of issue come up, personally. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Using general Feats when your ability is already 20
Top