Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Using general Feats when your ability is already 20
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Flights of Fancy" data-source="post: 9677479" data-attributes="member: 7037975"><p>Sure, it happens, I guess, maybe... for similar PCs but one capped at 20, the other at 14, but like you said it is insanely rare. If it ever did happen, it would probably be hard on the player with the 14 score, sure. It shouldn't impact the DM one iota.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, for one thing, it means not only did the first player roll a nat 18, but the other player rolled 12 or lower all six times. Barring <em>everything else</em>, not many players will play a character with a maximum roll of 12. If that player <em>does choose</em> that, it is their choice and they should realize going into the game their PC will have to shine in ways <em>other than ability scores</em>.</p><p></p><p>It also means the second player decided to make a "similar" PC to the first player, and even after realizing there was another similar character with a much better ability, decided again to play their PC anyway.</p><p></p><p>Lastly, it means the DM also knew about this and didn't encourage the second player to make a different PC so they would as likely be outshined by the first player's PC.</p><p></p><p>Frankly, I don't imagine this ever happening once, let alone a second time (history repeating itself) within the same group. I would hardly call that consistent.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, I don't [USER=7030563]@ECMO3[/USER] is saying it wouldn't be significant, nor am I, we all agree the difference between 20 and 14 would be significant in this circumstances... I just don't see any sane way this situation should <em>ever</em> occur giving the odds not only of the rolls, but the choices made by the players and the even the DM. You claim you've seen such a thing happen so I won't doubt that, but honestly how often really?</p><p></p><p>And you'll probably argue frequency doesn't matter again. But it does. I don't worry about being hit by a bus even though that is significant, sure, because I know it will most likely never happen. So, I won't worry about the lightning-striking odds of two similar PCs with 20 and 14 and a player feeling unpowered next to the "star".</p><p></p><p></p><p>Oh, no doubt you can play a CON 10 PC or even lower, like you said you jsut have to play a different way.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I've never found this to be the case due to how many ways you can take damage which have nothing to do with AC. But VMMY certainly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Flights of Fancy, post: 9677479, member: 7037975"] Sure, it happens, I guess, maybe... for similar PCs but one capped at 20, the other at 14, but like you said it is insanely rare. If it ever did happen, it would probably be hard on the player with the 14 score, sure. It shouldn't impact the DM one iota. Anyway, for one thing, it means not only did the first player roll a nat 18, but the other player rolled 12 or lower all six times. Barring [I]everything else[/I], not many players will play a character with a maximum roll of 12. If that player [I]does choose[/I] that, it is their choice and they should realize going into the game their PC will have to shine in ways [I]other than ability scores[/I]. It also means the second player decided to make a "similar" PC to the first player, and even after realizing there was another similar character with a much better ability, decided again to play their PC anyway. Lastly, it means the DM also knew about this and didn't encourage the second player to make a different PC so they would as likely be outshined by the first player's PC. Frankly, I don't imagine this ever happening once, let alone a second time (history repeating itself) within the same group. I would hardly call that consistent. Anyway, I don't [USER=7030563]@ECMO3[/USER] is saying it wouldn't be significant, nor am I, we all agree the difference between 20 and 14 would be significant in this circumstances... I just don't see any sane way this situation should [I]ever[/I] occur giving the odds not only of the rolls, but the choices made by the players and the even the DM. You claim you've seen such a thing happen so I won't doubt that, but honestly how often really? And you'll probably argue frequency doesn't matter again. But it does. I don't worry about being hit by a bus even though that is significant, sure, because I know it will most likely never happen. So, I won't worry about the lightning-striking odds of two similar PCs with 20 and 14 and a player feeling unpowered next to the "star". Oh, no doubt you can play a CON 10 PC or even lower, like you said you jsut have to play a different way. I've never found this to be the case due to how many ways you can take damage which have nothing to do with AC. But VMMY certainly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Using general Feats when your ability is already 20
Top