Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Using Lances with mounts that can attack
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jodyjohnson" data-source="post: 1796447" data-attributes="member: 5590"><p>Generally if you want both to attack on a charge both should have the same reach. Otherwise pick one attack for the charge and that's all you get.</p><p></p><p>SRD Mounted Combat:</p><p></p><p></p><p>Note that this doesn't preclude the mount attacking on a charge if it ends in a position to do so. (The Ride check for the riding to attack if the mount attacks covers that.) The only stipulation for getting an attack benefit on a charge is that the attack occurs at the end of the charge (movement). The rider and mount get the defensive penalty either way.</p><p></p><p>It also allows the rider to take a single normal attack at any point in the move while the mount must make it's attack before or after its move action or at the end of a charge.</p><p></p><p>Alternately you might stretch the interpretation slightly (house rule) and consider the mount as the primary attacker (charge and attack) and then allow the rider his normal one attack during a mount move >5' and grant that normal attack the benefits of charging. </p><p></p><p>Regarding mount and rider attacking it is legitimate for the mount to make a 5' step before or after the rider's full attack and get its full attack if it has not otherwise moved. If the mount has moved more than 5' than the rider only gets one melee attack at any point in the move.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jodyjohnson, post: 1796447, member: 5590"] Generally if you want both to attack on a charge both should have the same reach. Otherwise pick one attack for the charge and that's all you get. SRD Mounted Combat: Note that this doesn't preclude the mount attacking on a charge if it ends in a position to do so. (The Ride check for the riding to attack if the mount attacks covers that.) The only stipulation for getting an attack benefit on a charge is that the attack occurs at the end of the charge (movement). The rider and mount get the defensive penalty either way. It also allows the rider to take a single normal attack at any point in the move while the mount must make it's attack before or after its move action or at the end of a charge. Alternately you might stretch the interpretation slightly (house rule) and consider the mount as the primary attacker (charge and attack) and then allow the rider his normal one attack during a mount move >5' and grant that normal attack the benefits of charging. Regarding mount and rider attacking it is legitimate for the mount to make a 5' step before or after the rider's full attack and get its full attack if it has not otherwise moved. If the mount has moved more than 5' than the rider only gets one melee attack at any point in the move. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Using Lances with mounts that can attack
Top