Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="IceBear" data-source="post: 324013" data-attributes="member: 1118">I know the House Rules forum is over there - this isn't my thread <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />1) Apparently it's not that hard as from the posts on here there are many people using this tactic.&nbsp; Just takes an 8th level sorcerer or a 7th level wizard with scrolls.2) Exactly what this thread was started for.&nbsp; Since Polymorph Other has such obvious benefits wouldn't EVERYONE be using it now?3) I thought they got rid of the -2 thing in an errata (so confused about the errata on this spell).Anyway, yes, I've never had polymorph cast once in my game so I don't have a real opinion one way or another, but if it DID become a problem then I would HOUSE RULE&nbsp; it to have side effects like in 2nd Edition.As was pointed out to me earlier, despite this being the official rules forum, you occasionally have to dip into House Rule land when discussing how to deal with a rule that someone considers broken (not that I'm saying it is, but it certainly sounds like it).IceBear</blockquote>

[QUOTE="IceBear, post: 324013, member: 1118"] I know the House Rules forum is over there - this isn't my thread :) 1) Apparently it's not that hard as from the posts on here there are many people using this tactic. Just takes an 8th level sorcerer or a 7th level wizard with scrolls. 2) Exactly what this thread was started for. Since Polymorph Other has such obvious benefits wouldn't EVERYONE be using it now? 3) I thought they got rid of the -2 thing in an errata (so confused about the errata on this spell). Anyway, yes, I've never had polymorph cast once in my game so I don't have a real opinion one way or another, but if it DID become a problem then I would HOUSE RULE it to have side effects like in 2nd Edition. As was pointed out to me earlier, despite this being the official rules forum, you occasionally have to dip into House Rule land when discussing how to deal with a rule that someone considers broken (not that I'm saying it is, but it certainly sounds like it). IceBear [/QUOTE]

Verification