Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Bastoche" data-source="post: 325913" data-attributes="member: 306">I agree, and thanks for your support.1) I have been wandering sparsly the board since the very begining of 3E (for what 3 years now ?). I know how this forum works, thankyouverymuch <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />.2) I agree that house rules (on a case by case basis) should be discussed in the house rule forum, but mentionning it's use should not be prohibited in the rules forum IMO. Plus, I've seen more and more off-topics thread in the rules forum since the &quot;post Noah&quot; era. All the kind of &quot;how should I build my dream fighter ?&quot; and &quot;attentions to all powergamers&quot;, and the &quot;should I take X feat for my Y character ?&quot;. I don't know if the moderators are more severe than they used to do, but with all due respect to both of you, I don't think I need any lessons about how this board works <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />.3) The only only point I wanted to make is that not everybody use or agree with the errata. So saying that errata=official rules needs to be nuanced IMO. But like I said, that's just me. I think discussing the &quot;uncorrected&quot; rules from the PHB should be as legitimate as the &quot;corrected&quot; rules in this forum IMO.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Bastoche, post: 325913, member: 306"] I agree, and thanks for your support. 1) I have been wandering sparsly the board since the very begining of 3E (for what 3 years now ?). I know how this forum works, thankyouverymuch ;). 2) I agree that house rules (on a case by case basis) should be discussed in the house rule forum, but mentionning it's use should not be prohibited in the rules forum IMO. Plus, I've seen more and more off-topics thread in the rules forum since the "post Noah" era. All the kind of "how should I build my dream fighter ?" and "attentions to all powergamers", and the "should I take X feat for my Y character ?". I don't know if the moderators are more severe than they used to do, but with all due respect to both of you, I don't think I need any lessons about how this board works :p. 3) The only only point I wanted to make is that not everybody use or agree with the errata. So saying that errata=official rules needs to be nuanced IMO. But like I said, that's just me. I think discussing the "uncorrected" rules from the PHB should be as legitimate as the "corrected" rules in this forum IMO. [/QUOTE]

Verification