Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Using social skills on other PCs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 8472059" data-attributes="member: 6779196"><p>Yes, this. To be clear, I think I agree with [USER=29398]@Lanefan[/USER] as well, for the most part. It’s the DM’s role to describe the environment and determine the outcomes of the players’ actions, calling for a roll if necessary to resolve uncertainty in the outcome. But ultimately it is the DM who determines what is or isn’t certain, so yes, the DM can always decide that a PC’s social action succeeds or fails without need of a roll. I simply tend to find uncertainty in the outcomes of PCs’ social actions more often than not, whereas Lanefan sounds like he tends never to find uncertainty there.</p><p></p><p>As for whether or not the outcome of an NPC’s social action is certain or uncertain, in my evaluation it’s always certain. Because the general rule (to which there are specific exceptions such as spells) is that the player decides what their character thinks and does. So, I when I describe a social action an NPC takes against a PC, since no specific exception is written in the rules for ability checks to the general rule that the player decides what their character thinks and does, it is certain that the player can react however they want to that action. If the player is uncertain how their own character would react, they are of course welcome to use any method they wish to resolve that. Heck, if a player told me they weren’t sure how their character would react and asked me to make an ability check for the NPC, I would.</p><p></p><p>Now, all this is not to say my approach is the only valid one. Many groups have in place some manner of table rule which does constitute specific exceptions to the general rule that the player decides what their character thinks and does under certain circumstances. Such as when the player’s out-of-character knowledge is deemed to be influencing their decision of what to do, or when another character (perhaps an NPC) takes a social action targeting them. That’s perfectly fine, play the game however you like.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Charlaquin, post: 8472059, member: 6779196"] Yes, this. To be clear, I think I agree with [USER=29398]@Lanefan[/USER] as well, for the most part. It’s the DM’s role to describe the environment and determine the outcomes of the players’ actions, calling for a roll if necessary to resolve uncertainty in the outcome. But ultimately it is the DM who determines what is or isn’t certain, so yes, the DM can always decide that a PC’s social action succeeds or fails without need of a roll. I simply tend to find uncertainty in the outcomes of PCs’ social actions more often than not, whereas Lanefan sounds like he tends never to find uncertainty there. As for whether or not the outcome of an NPC’s social action is certain or uncertain, in my evaluation it’s always certain. Because the general rule (to which there are specific exceptions such as spells) is that the player decides what their character thinks and does. So, I when I describe a social action an NPC takes against a PC, since no specific exception is written in the rules for ability checks to the general rule that the player decides what their character thinks and does, it is certain that the player can react however they want to that action. If the player is uncertain how their own character would react, they are of course welcome to use any method they wish to resolve that. Heck, if a player told me they weren’t sure how their character would react and asked me to make an ability check for the NPC, I would. Now, all this is not to say my approach is the only valid one. Many groups have in place some manner of table rule which does constitute specific exceptions to the general rule that the player decides what their character thinks and does under certain circumstances. Such as when the player’s out-of-character knowledge is deemed to be influencing their decision of what to do, or when another character (perhaps an NPC) takes a social action targeting them. That’s perfectly fine, play the game however you like. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Using social skills on other PCs
Top