Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="iserith" data-source="post: 8474820" data-attributes="member: 97077">If we're talking about what the rules say, I'll Like the post of anyone who gets it correct, even if we're disagreeing on other matters. [USER=23751]@Maxperson[/USER] and I disagree on many things. But here they are correct in my view and so credit where credit is due. It doesn't matter to me if they are wrong on Int-5 Sherlock Holmes. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60f.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":sneaky:" title="Sneaky&nbsp; &nbsp; :sneaky:"&nbsp; data-smilie="21"data-shortname=":sneaky:" />If we're talking about acknowledging that how someone plays is valid provided their group likes it, that is a given and I've said as much.The rules for ability checks are set up for resolving all actions regardless of who is taking the action and who may be affected by it.Thank you.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="iserith, post: 8474820, member: 97077"] If we're talking about what the rules say, I'll Like the post of anyone who gets it correct, even if we're disagreeing on other matters. [USER=23751]@Maxperson[/USER] and I disagree on many things. But here they are correct in my view and so credit where credit is due. It doesn't matter to me if they are wrong on Int-5 Sherlock Holmes. :sneaky: If we're talking about acknowledging that how someone plays is valid provided their group likes it, that is a given and I've said as much. The rules for ability checks are set up for resolving [B]all [/B]actions regardless of who is taking the action and who may be affected by it. Thank you. [/QUOTE]

Verification