Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Using social skills on other PCs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 8475135" data-attributes="member: 6779196"><p>It’s not an attempt at straw manning, it’s a defense against it. People keep arguing as if I’m claiming something I’m not - that the rules somehow disallow the DM from ruling that an action made to force a PC to make a certain decision is uncertain. I’m not, and my position is that the rules don’t disallow this, or any other ruling. I do think than any assertion about what the DM can’t do is meaningless. I do, however, think there is meaning in distinguishing between what the rules instruct the DM to do (which is to say, support the DM in doing), and what they do not. I believe this to be the latter.</p><p></p><p>No, most things don’t require a suspension of roleplaying, because most things don’t force the PC to make a decision contrary to the player’s intent.</p><p></p><p>No, the DM doesn’t need to halt roleplaying to resolve an action unless that action would prevent roleplaying, as defined in the rule we keep arguing about. And I’d the action would do so, I don’t believe the rules would support the DM in ruling the action as uncertain, whether it’s a PC or an NPC taking it.</p><p></p><p>And again, this is not my intent. I’m sorry if I keep giving you the impression that I’m not treating your position fairly, but I am trying to argue in good faith here. </p><p></p><p>I understand that. I once again am not claiming my position is the best logical interpretation of the rules. I think my position does make logical sense; I think other positions have mage logical sense as well. There was one person who’s counter arguments were not well logically founded and I stopped engaging with them because it was clear they and I weren’t going to be able to get anywhere. I think I’ve demonstrated how my conclusions flow from the rules as they’re written, and I think it’s pretty clearly not circular. If you disagree, I don’t know what else to say other than to continue to respond in rebuttal to the objections you raise to my arguments and let anyone who’s actually still reading this thread draw their own conclusions from our arguments.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Charlaquin, post: 8475135, member: 6779196"] It’s not an attempt at straw manning, it’s a defense against it. People keep arguing as if I’m claiming something I’m not - that the rules somehow disallow the DM from ruling that an action made to force a PC to make a certain decision is uncertain. I’m not, and my position is that the rules don’t disallow this, or any other ruling. I do think than any assertion about what the DM can’t do is meaningless. I do, however, think there is meaning in distinguishing between what the rules instruct the DM to do (which is to say, support the DM in doing), and what they do not. I believe this to be the latter. No, most things don’t require a suspension of roleplaying, because most things don’t force the PC to make a decision contrary to the player’s intent. No, the DM doesn’t need to halt roleplaying to resolve an action unless that action would prevent roleplaying, as defined in the rule we keep arguing about. And I’d the action would do so, I don’t believe the rules would support the DM in ruling the action as uncertain, whether it’s a PC or an NPC taking it. And again, this is not my intent. I’m sorry if I keep giving you the impression that I’m not treating your position fairly, but I am trying to argue in good faith here. I understand that. I once again am not claiming my position is the best logical interpretation of the rules. I think my position does make logical sense; I think other positions have mage logical sense as well. There was one person who’s counter arguments were not well logically founded and I stopped engaging with them because it was clear they and I weren’t going to be able to get anywhere. I think I’ve demonstrated how my conclusions flow from the rules as they’re written, and I think it’s pretty clearly not circular. If you disagree, I don’t know what else to say other than to continue to respond in rebuttal to the objections you raise to my arguments and let anyone who’s actually still reading this thread draw their own conclusions from our arguments. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Using social skills on other PCs
Top