Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Using social skills on other PCs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 8475479" data-attributes="member: 6779196"><p>The roleplaying rule doesn’t need to be given primacy. A rule applies unless a more specific rule contradicts it. And my argument does not suggest that anything is “more permitted” than others. The rules instruct the DM to do some things, and do not instruct the DM to do other things. My position is simply that making an ability check to resolve an action taken to force a player to make a certain decision for their character is in the latter category.</p><p></p><p>I haven’t moved the goalposts, I just misunderstood Clearstream’s premise. What I thought was arguing the premise as they presented it was in fact not. My bad there.</p><p></p><p>No. I am not treating any checks differently than each other. If there are two bins, they are “actions with uncertain outcomes” and “actions without uncertain outcomes” all actions in the second bin are not appropriate to resolve with ability checks of any kind. All actions in the first bin are appropriate to resolve with ability checks.</p><p></p><p>No, whether an action is taken by a PC or an NPC has no bearing on how it ought to be resolved.</p><p></p><p>You’ve got that reversed. The certainty or uncertainty of an action is what determines which bin it goes in.</p><p></p><p>These objections you raise do not actually conflict with my interpretation of the rules. But apparently there is nothing I can say to demonstrate that fact and won’t be dismissed as “special pleading,” so I’m just not going to bother engaging with these objections any more. I’ve demonstrated why they don’t conflict with my reading, no point banging my head against a wall if you’re just going to keep accusing me of making up “imaginative excuses.</p><p></p><p>It literally says “the creature is charmed by you.”</p><p></p><p>Great. I’m engaging in motivated thinking, so you don’t have to actually address my argument, you can just dismiss it as illegitimate. Have fun with that.</p><p></p><p>Mhmm. Go off.</p><p></p><p>Your argument was that there is no path from the RAW that can arrive at the RAI. I tell you that I did in fact arrive at the RAI by following a path to the RAW.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Charlaquin, post: 8475479, member: 6779196"] The roleplaying rule doesn’t need to be given primacy. A rule applies unless a more specific rule contradicts it. And my argument does not suggest that anything is “more permitted” than others. The rules instruct the DM to do some things, and do not instruct the DM to do other things. My position is simply that making an ability check to resolve an action taken to force a player to make a certain decision for their character is in the latter category. I haven’t moved the goalposts, I just misunderstood Clearstream’s premise. What I thought was arguing the premise as they presented it was in fact not. My bad there. No. I am not treating any checks differently than each other. If there are two bins, they are “actions with uncertain outcomes” and “actions without uncertain outcomes” all actions in the second bin are not appropriate to resolve with ability checks of any kind. All actions in the first bin are appropriate to resolve with ability checks. No, whether an action is taken by a PC or an NPC has no bearing on how it ought to be resolved. You’ve got that reversed. The certainty or uncertainty of an action is what determines which bin it goes in. These objections you raise do not actually conflict with my interpretation of the rules. But apparently there is nothing I can say to demonstrate that fact and won’t be dismissed as “special pleading,” so I’m just not going to bother engaging with these objections any more. I’ve demonstrated why they don’t conflict with my reading, no point banging my head against a wall if you’re just going to keep accusing me of making up “imaginative excuses. It literally says “the creature is charmed by you.” Great. I’m engaging in motivated thinking, so you don’t have to actually address my argument, you can just dismiss it as illegitimate. Have fun with that. Mhmm. Go off. Your argument was that there is no path from the RAW that can arrive at the RAI. I tell you that I did in fact arrive at the RAI by following a path to the RAW. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Using social skills on other PCs
Top