Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Using social skills on other PCs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 8477013" data-attributes="member: 23751"><p>People misinterpret things and keep doing so. Misinterpretations don't become valid interpretations just because the people doing it believe that they are correct.</p><p></p><p>If the outcome is in doubt and there is a meaningful consequence for failure, then an ability check is called for. </p><p></p><p>So if I describe the orc engaging in a great display of intimidation, the next step is for the player to decide success, failure or doubt. If the player says, "The orc's display makes me a bit nervous, but I cannot be cowed," then the intimidation has failed. If the player says, "Holy cow. I don't want to mess with that guy. I turn around and run back into the forest and try to get away, " the intimidation has succeeded. If the player says, "That's a really impressive display, I'm really not sure if I would stay or run," then a roll is called for because the outcome is in doubt and there is a meaningful consequence for failure.</p><p></p><p>Those aren't the rules. The rules are that such a check is not made unless the outcome is already in doubt and there is a meaningful consequence for failure. </p><p></p><p>You joined a long time ago, but your post numbers indicate that you're fairly new to posting things and participation. So you might not be aware that this is the umpteenth thread on this. I'm not going to go back and dig through at LEAST a dozen threads in order to prove to you that you only speak for yourself and not everyone. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>So, I don't like or dislike any argument you've made. And no, not one of them has supported the ability to override the rule that the player gets to decide what his character thinks or feels. </p><p></p><p>You still haven't responded to the fact that your interpretation turns social skills into a form of mind control that is superior to the Suggestion spell. Do you really think the designers intended social skills to be more powerful than a 2nd level spell designed to control minds?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Maxperson, post: 8477013, member: 23751"] People misinterpret things and keep doing so. Misinterpretations don't become valid interpretations just because the people doing it believe that they are correct. If the outcome is in doubt and there is a meaningful consequence for failure, then an ability check is called for. So if I describe the orc engaging in a great display of intimidation, the next step is for the player to decide success, failure or doubt. If the player says, "The orc's display makes me a bit nervous, but I cannot be cowed," then the intimidation has failed. If the player says, "Holy cow. I don't want to mess with that guy. I turn around and run back into the forest and try to get away, " the intimidation has succeeded. If the player says, "That's a really impressive display, I'm really not sure if I would stay or run," then a roll is called for because the outcome is in doubt and there is a meaningful consequence for failure. Those aren't the rules. The rules are that such a check is not made unless the outcome is already in doubt and there is a meaningful consequence for failure. You joined a long time ago, but your post numbers indicate that you're fairly new to posting things and participation. So you might not be aware that this is the umpteenth thread on this. I'm not going to go back and dig through at LEAST a dozen threads in order to prove to you that you only speak for yourself and not everyone. ;) So, I don't like or dislike any argument you've made. And no, not one of them has supported the ability to override the rule that the player gets to decide what his character thinks or feels. You still haven't responded to the fact that your interpretation turns social skills into a form of mind control that is superior to the Suggestion spell. Do you really think the designers intended social skills to be more powerful than a 2nd level spell designed to control minds? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Using social skills on other PCs
Top