Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Using social skills on other PCs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="clearstream" data-source="post: 8478892" data-attributes="member: 71699"><p>A group could do it that way. If our thought here is we need to do this to protect prior certainty, then for me that is misguided.</p><p></p><p>I thought I should call out BTW that my position is that it is clear RAI - strongly supported in RAW - that ability checks shouldn't override player agency. For what it's worth, I draw a distinction between agency (does) and thought (thinks). Holistically the rules uphold player agency while being forgiving on thought (so a player can be misled, and that doesn't raise any particular conflict.) DM decides what is uncertain.</p><p></p><p>I'm not sure what the motive would be to demand prior certainty as it creates problems where none need exist. The rest of the process is right.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes! The passive check applies, or a check can be made. It's up to the DM. Albeit, to me, it is more like Stealth.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Of course. That is your approach, but surely you can agree that it is up to each group whether their DM will telegraph like that?</p><p></p><p></p><p>More like Stealth, I believe. The NPC check goes against PC passive.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="clearstream, post: 8478892, member: 71699"] A group could do it that way. If our thought here is we need to do this to protect prior certainty, then for me that is misguided. I thought I should call out BTW that my position is that it is clear RAI - strongly supported in RAW - that ability checks shouldn't override player agency. For what it's worth, I draw a distinction between agency (does) and thought (thinks). Holistically the rules uphold player agency while being forgiving on thought (so a player can be misled, and that doesn't raise any particular conflict.) DM decides what is uncertain. I'm not sure what the motive would be to demand prior certainty as it creates problems where none need exist. The rest of the process is right. Yes! The passive check applies, or a check can be made. It's up to the DM. Albeit, to me, it is more like Stealth. Of course. That is your approach, but surely you can agree that it is up to each group whether their DM will telegraph like that? More like Stealth, I believe. The NPC check goes against PC passive. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Using social skills on other PCs
Top