Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Using Summoned Creatures to gain an AoO
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Geron Raveneye" data-source="post: 1910705" data-attributes="member: 2268"><p>Bingo. That's what I've been doing for the last two days. Or do you really think I'm here with the mission to convince everybody that I'm right, and that I can prove it from the rules as written? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yup, and that reason was most likely because Hasbro wants to sell this product called D&D to the parents of 12-years old, too, with an eye on how the merciless butchering and killing of summoned creatures would affect said parents opinion of this product. They could as well have tacked a "No animals or outerplanar creatures are harmed in the course of this special effect." sentence at the end. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Of course it does kill the creature. It says in the description that they can be killed, hmm? That the act of killing them sends them away is a side effect of the spell's magic.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Who's us? Right now, you're the very only one who claims that those creatures killed during the summoning are not dead, that they effectively are not even harmed, but merely put to sleep, and wake up 24 hours later without any memory of what happened. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> </p><p></p><p>And, as far as I'm concerned, I've explained the "different interpretation" at last twice in the course of this thread. Being dead is the condition a creature is in after it has been killed. "It's not really dead", with the explanation about the body being reformed 24 hours later, can be summarized as an "It's not dead for very long".</p><p>How about you trying to explain to <strong>me</strong> what they mean with "not really dead"? What is it, then, in the 24 hours that it takes for the body to reform? Does it not exist in the meantime? Does <em>Summon Monster</em> miraculously create a new soul, as the body and soul of an outsider are the same? And why am I even bothering to ask, seeing as you simply ignore any question that would put your whole line of reasoning into the game's context, and instead keep throwing simple sentences at me like "It's not killing" and "It is not really dead" as some kind of arguments.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nah, that's okay, fortunately there's enough context in the whole game to put this little sentence into. No need to dismiss it, except as either a badly worded timeframe, or a badly framed disclaimer.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's weird, why then does it say two sentences before that it goes away if it is killed, and not that it goes away if it's body is destroyed? Maybe because, as you so nicely quoted a few posts back, for an outsider, body and soul are the same? You kill the body, you destroy the soul. The magic simply makes sure it will come back in perfect condition, kinda like a delayed <em>True Resurrection</em> or <em>Limited Wish</em> with a perfect chance of occuring.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Hmhmm...my unique interpretation du jour actually takes all the rules into account, at least all that matter. A creature is summoned by a spell, and as soon as it is decimated to -10 HP, i.e. it is killed by D&D rules, it dies, vanishes, and is resurrected 24 hours later in a new body on it's home plane, where the spell effect deposited it. The <em>"It's not really dead"</em> simply comes into play as a disclaimer that this creature doesn't stay dead, as the resurrection effect takes place under all circumstances, except maybe if it's home plane is destroyed in the intervening time, so it will <strong>always</strong> come back to life. It's not <em>really</em> dead, it will be resurrected with a 100% certainty in 24 hours. It won't lose a level, won't lose a point of Constitution, won't be under any lingering spell effects, and as bad memories don't have any measurable effect in D&D, it won't suffer from it being killed, same way no resurrected character suffers mental repercussions for being killed.</p><p></p><p>Now, if I would have to summarize your unique interpretation du jour, it'd be something like: A creature is summoned by a spell, and as soon as it is decimated to -10 HP, it is killed, except that it isn't really, because it can't be killed, it simply vanishes. It is not really dead though, it simply is...gone, maybe sleeping, maybe simply not there...until it is reformed 24 hours later. It can't be dead because, if it's killed, it is not really dead.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Geron Raveneye, post: 1910705, member: 2268"] Bingo. That's what I've been doing for the last two days. Or do you really think I'm here with the mission to convince everybody that I'm right, and that I can prove it from the rules as written? ;) Yup, and that reason was most likely because Hasbro wants to sell this product called D&D to the parents of 12-years old, too, with an eye on how the merciless butchering and killing of summoned creatures would affect said parents opinion of this product. They could as well have tacked a "No animals or outerplanar creatures are harmed in the course of this special effect." sentence at the end. ;) Of course it does kill the creature. It says in the description that they can be killed, hmm? That the act of killing them sends them away is a side effect of the spell's magic. Who's us? Right now, you're the very only one who claims that those creatures killed during the summoning are not dead, that they effectively are not even harmed, but merely put to sleep, and wake up 24 hours later without any memory of what happened. ;) And, as far as I'm concerned, I've explained the "different interpretation" at last twice in the course of this thread. Being dead is the condition a creature is in after it has been killed. "It's not really dead", with the explanation about the body being reformed 24 hours later, can be summarized as an "It's not dead for very long". How about you trying to explain to [b]me[/b] what they mean with "not really dead"? What is it, then, in the 24 hours that it takes for the body to reform? Does it not exist in the meantime? Does [i]Summon Monster[/i] miraculously create a new soul, as the body and soul of an outsider are the same? And why am I even bothering to ask, seeing as you simply ignore any question that would put your whole line of reasoning into the game's context, and instead keep throwing simple sentences at me like "It's not killing" and "It is not really dead" as some kind of arguments. Nah, that's okay, fortunately there's enough context in the whole game to put this little sentence into. No need to dismiss it, except as either a badly worded timeframe, or a badly framed disclaimer. That's weird, why then does it say two sentences before that it goes away if it is killed, and not that it goes away if it's body is destroyed? Maybe because, as you so nicely quoted a few posts back, for an outsider, body and soul are the same? You kill the body, you destroy the soul. The magic simply makes sure it will come back in perfect condition, kinda like a delayed [i]True Resurrection[/i] or [i]Limited Wish[/i] with a perfect chance of occuring. Hmhmm...my unique interpretation du jour actually takes all the rules into account, at least all that matter. A creature is summoned by a spell, and as soon as it is decimated to -10 HP, i.e. it is killed by D&D rules, it dies, vanishes, and is resurrected 24 hours later in a new body on it's home plane, where the spell effect deposited it. The [i]"It's not really dead"[/i] simply comes into play as a disclaimer that this creature doesn't stay dead, as the resurrection effect takes place under all circumstances, except maybe if it's home plane is destroyed in the intervening time, so it will [b]always[/b] come back to life. It's not [i]really[/i] dead, it will be resurrected with a 100% certainty in 24 hours. It won't lose a level, won't lose a point of Constitution, won't be under any lingering spell effects, and as bad memories don't have any measurable effect in D&D, it won't suffer from it being killed, same way no resurrected character suffers mental repercussions for being killed. Now, if I would have to summarize your unique interpretation du jour, it'd be something like: A creature is summoned by a spell, and as soon as it is decimated to -10 HP, it is killed, except that it isn't really, because it can't be killed, it simply vanishes. It is not really dead though, it simply is...gone, maybe sleeping, maybe simply not there...until it is reformed 24 hours later. It can't be dead because, if it's killed, it is not really dead. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Using Summoned Creatures to gain an AoO
Top