Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Stormonu" data-source="post: 5547730" data-attributes="member: 52734">Back in the day, classes followed different XP charts as part of the balancing factor of the class.  By 3E, this had been dropped, with the idea that "all classes are equal" (though I don't think anyone really buys that).Granted, I'm just starting up my first Pathfinder game, but I'm considering doing the following to help in balancing the relative power inequalities I'm used to seeing:Full Casters will use the Slow XP Progression chart (Cleric, Druid, Sorcerer, Wizard)Partial Casters will use the Medium XP Progression chart (Bard, Paladin, Ranger)Non-Casters will use the Fast XP Progression chart (Barbarian, Fighter, Rogue*)* Not sure what to do if the Rogue takes the spellcasting talent.Players will need to announce what class they will be progressing in for the next level so they can determine the proper XP they need for the next level.  Note that XP needed per level is different from the "total XP" listed on the three charts.  For example, to go from 3rdh to 4th level, the Slows need 6,500 XP, Mediums need 4,000 XP and Fasts need only 2,700 XP.I'll imagine this has been brought up before - has anyone tried it and how did it work out?  Were there issues with doing something like this?</blockquote>