Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Using XP Charts to Assist Balancing Classes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dingo333" data-source="post: 5547930" data-attributes="member: 6672910"><p>Personally, I don't like the idea, but I would be willing to try it out</p><p></p><p>My biggest problem would be how you would balance some things. For example, Oracle, Alchemist, Inquisitor, Summoner, Magus. An oracle would be in the caster (slow) progression, that is fine, it makes sense and is fair. An alchemist would fall where? fast? it has spells/extracts. Medium? it is lumped with a bard there, the only thing that compares, and then it is nerfed compared to rouge. Fast? even more nerf, can't keep up with its buddys in that track for spells. Inquisitor, paladin falls into medium, but inquisitor is more spells (and more useful ones) then a pally or ranger. It is also lower BAB compared to ranger and equal to cleric. so does it go in the medium-slow progression as it is kinda a halfway point between cleric and ranger? Magus has similar problems (I know it is not out YET comments on magus based on last playtest and spoilers). Summoner may be even worse off. Glancing at it, it gets slow off the bat, but this isn't fair to it, as it has no direct attack spells, and its main attack form is the eidolon or summons, both of which are slowed already compared to a fighter of the summoner's level.</p><p></p><p>I agree with Crothian. The classes are more balanced then you would think.</p><p>A paladin will outshine a fighter vs Undead</p><p>A ranger will outshine a fighter in the wild</p><p>A cleric will outshine a paladin vs Undead</p><p>A cleric can outshine a paladin in healing</p><p>A wizard will outshine the fighter in a siege/massive battle</p><p>A rouge outshines everyone in a dungeon with traps</p><p>In a short skirmish, the fighter will outshine the wizard</p><p></p><p>Each class has a niche, and a good DM will make encounters so that each can shine without outshining another. Each will get to show their area of expertise</p><p></p><p>P.S. The rouge gets A 0 level spells, usable 3pd and A 1st level spell, useable 2pd and (at or after 10th) the ability to try to dispel a magic effect on their target if they sneak attack. Unless there is another talent I am not aware of or you are speaking about UMD, I don't see an issue with them being noncaster type except their damage overshadowing the rest of the group</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dingo333, post: 5547930, member: 6672910"] Personally, I don't like the idea, but I would be willing to try it out My biggest problem would be how you would balance some things. For example, Oracle, Alchemist, Inquisitor, Summoner, Magus. An oracle would be in the caster (slow) progression, that is fine, it makes sense and is fair. An alchemist would fall where? fast? it has spells/extracts. Medium? it is lumped with a bard there, the only thing that compares, and then it is nerfed compared to rouge. Fast? even more nerf, can't keep up with its buddys in that track for spells. Inquisitor, paladin falls into medium, but inquisitor is more spells (and more useful ones) then a pally or ranger. It is also lower BAB compared to ranger and equal to cleric. so does it go in the medium-slow progression as it is kinda a halfway point between cleric and ranger? Magus has similar problems (I know it is not out YET comments on magus based on last playtest and spoilers). Summoner may be even worse off. Glancing at it, it gets slow off the bat, but this isn't fair to it, as it has no direct attack spells, and its main attack form is the eidolon or summons, both of which are slowed already compared to a fighter of the summoner's level. I agree with Crothian. The classes are more balanced then you would think. A paladin will outshine a fighter vs Undead A ranger will outshine a fighter in the wild A cleric will outshine a paladin vs Undead A cleric can outshine a paladin in healing A wizard will outshine the fighter in a siege/massive battle A rouge outshines everyone in a dungeon with traps In a short skirmish, the fighter will outshine the wizard Each class has a niche, and a good DM will make encounters so that each can shine without outshining another. Each will get to show their area of expertise P.S. The rouge gets A 0 level spells, usable 3pd and A 1st level spell, useable 2pd and (at or after 10th) the ability to try to dispel a magic effect on their target if they sneak attack. Unless there is another talent I am not aware of or you are speaking about UMD, I don't see an issue with them being noncaster type except their damage overshadowing the rest of the group [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Using XP Charts to Assist Balancing Classes
Top