Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Usurping the party spokesman role
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BSF" data-source="post: 1995727" data-attributes="member: 13098"><p>Niche protection is a good thing and I tend to highlight potential conflicts for my players as they advance. But it sounds like the rogue assumed he had the niche staked out by putting a token number of points into it. </p><p></p><p>I see this often in my game. One of the players tends to think that a +10 to the skill check is as high as he needs to go. When he was playing a rogue, this made for a very diversified rogue. But it also meant he wasn't very good at oppossed skill checks as the group increased in power. When other PCs started doing better with Spot, Listen and Search, he got a little twitchy. The problem is when PCs start running around at 12th level and the rogue expects his spot skill niche to be "protected" with his +10 total skill bonus, he really gave up that niche. </p><p></p><p>It sounds like the rogue in this case has done something similar with Diplomacy. He put some skill ranks into it to be good enough and then assumed that it was his niche. The fighter has been developing diplomacy and has finally exceeded the rogue. If it were really an important niche to the rogue, he could have developed it further and the fighter would never be able to touch him. </p><p></p><p>In this case, I probably would let it all sort itself out with the players. After all, the rogue still has a lot of utility in the group. As well, he has plenty of potential to use social skills in other situations. Perhaps the fighter brushes shoulders with the upper crust while the rogue gets on well with the common man. Or vice-versa. As a DM, I would look for those opportunities to bring more benefits to the entire group. They have two "face men" now and they can pick up information, friends and assistance from many different efforts. </p><p></p><p>Now if one or both players have serious issues with it, then it is time to discuss things. The fighter has really taken a hit in skills and stat boost to get where he is. He has been working at it. The rogue assumed that his high Cha and a couple of ranks would be enough to carry him through and then focused on other skills. If the rogue really wants that alpha male face man status, he has to work at it. Fortunately, he has 8 skill points base to work with at the next level. You want to be the face man? Put your skill points in the social skills. </p><p></p><p>But really, I see no reason why you can't have multiple avenues of working the general population with both PCs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BSF, post: 1995727, member: 13098"] Niche protection is a good thing and I tend to highlight potential conflicts for my players as they advance. But it sounds like the rogue assumed he had the niche staked out by putting a token number of points into it. I see this often in my game. One of the players tends to think that a +10 to the skill check is as high as he needs to go. When he was playing a rogue, this made for a very diversified rogue. But it also meant he wasn't very good at oppossed skill checks as the group increased in power. When other PCs started doing better with Spot, Listen and Search, he got a little twitchy. The problem is when PCs start running around at 12th level and the rogue expects his spot skill niche to be "protected" with his +10 total skill bonus, he really gave up that niche. It sounds like the rogue in this case has done something similar with Diplomacy. He put some skill ranks into it to be good enough and then assumed that it was his niche. The fighter has been developing diplomacy and has finally exceeded the rogue. If it were really an important niche to the rogue, he could have developed it further and the fighter would never be able to touch him. In this case, I probably would let it all sort itself out with the players. After all, the rogue still has a lot of utility in the group. As well, he has plenty of potential to use social skills in other situations. Perhaps the fighter brushes shoulders with the upper crust while the rogue gets on well with the common man. Or vice-versa. As a DM, I would look for those opportunities to bring more benefits to the entire group. They have two "face men" now and they can pick up information, friends and assistance from many different efforts. Now if one or both players have serious issues with it, then it is time to discuss things. The fighter has really taken a hit in skills and stat boost to get where he is. He has been working at it. The rogue assumed that his high Cha and a couple of ranks would be enough to carry him through and then focused on other skills. If the rogue really wants that alpha male face man status, he has to work at it. Fortunately, he has 8 skill points base to work with at the next level. You want to be the face man? Put your skill points in the social skills. But really, I see no reason why you can't have multiple avenues of working the general population with both PCs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Usurping the party spokesman role
Top