Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
v4: Challenge Ratings pdf (3.5 compatible)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wulf Ratbane" data-source="post: 1174515" data-attributes="member: 94"><p>I'm gonna have to have you walk me through this one. Let me see if I understand.</p><p></p><p>Two 20th level player characters</p><p>Four 12th level cohorts</p><p>10x 1st level henchmen</p><p></p><p>(I consider this a reasonable party grouping, such as one might find in Piratecat's Story Hour.)</p><p></p><p>By my calculations, as a mixed group of adversaries, they are EL19. (CR total = 98, CR 98 = EL 27, sixteen creatures adjusts to EL19).</p><p></p><p>As a party, using your method, they are (98 levels / 16 characters) = Party Level 6.125.</p><p></p><p>Apply this to Table 2-1 per instructions yields EL 11.</p><p></p><p>Modify that by the number of characters in the party using Table 2-5 yields a PEL of 15.</p><p></p><p>So when this group "fights itself" we have PEL 15 vs. EL 19, which according to Table 2-6 means a 50/50 fight.</p><p></p><p>Did I get that right all the way through?</p><p></p><p>If so, I think my confusion arises because of your terminology. The "Party Encounter Level" does not mean, as it seems to imply, "The EL of this particular party." </p><p></p><p>I note that in your explanation to me above you actually make this same mistake.</p><p></p><p>Rather, PEL means, "The appropriate EL of an encounter designed to be a moderate challenge for this party."</p><p></p><p>PEL does NOT scale up according to the number of creatures in the group, as you misstated above-- that is to say, we should not apply Table 2-3 to this group. You've already taken care of the number of creatures in Table 2-5.</p><p></p><p>So to try to sum up and wrap up (unsuccessfully...) and perhaps hint at an easier walkthrough:</p><p></p><p>The EL of this group is, correctly calculated, at EL19.</p><p></p><p>A "50/50" matchup for this group is EL 19 (as you would expect).</p><p></p><p>The appropriate "moderate encounter" for this group is EL 15.</p><p></p><p>(That could be a single CR12 adversary; or it could be 6-7 CR5 adversaries, or it could be 16-31 CR3 adversaries... etc...)</p><p></p><p>You could simply find the EL of the group and then apply that result against a chart showing the breakdown:</p><p></p><p>Encounter EL - Party EL ---> Victory</p><p>-12 ---> 99.3%</p><p>-10 ---> 98.4%</p><p>-8 ---> 96.8%</p><p>-6 ---> 93.7%</p><p>-4 ---> 87.5%</p><p>-2 ---> 75%</p><p>+/- 0 ---> 50% (encouter level = party's encounter level)</p><p>+2 ---> 25%</p><p>+4 ---> 12.5%</p><p></p><p>Finally, according to my calculations, using your system, the "50/50" fight above (PEL 15 vs EL 19) would be worth Party Level (6th) x 1200 experience points, 7200 xp total, 450 xp per character.</p><p></p><p>So how'd I do with all that?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Wulf</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wulf Ratbane, post: 1174515, member: 94"] I'm gonna have to have you walk me through this one. Let me see if I understand. Two 20th level player characters Four 12th level cohorts 10x 1st level henchmen (I consider this a reasonable party grouping, such as one might find in Piratecat's Story Hour.) By my calculations, as a mixed group of adversaries, they are EL19. (CR total = 98, CR 98 = EL 27, sixteen creatures adjusts to EL19). As a party, using your method, they are (98 levels / 16 characters) = Party Level 6.125. Apply this to Table 2-1 per instructions yields EL 11. Modify that by the number of characters in the party using Table 2-5 yields a PEL of 15. So when this group "fights itself" we have PEL 15 vs. EL 19, which according to Table 2-6 means a 50/50 fight. Did I get that right all the way through? If so, I think my confusion arises because of your terminology. The "Party Encounter Level" does not mean, as it seems to imply, "The EL of this particular party." I note that in your explanation to me above you actually make this same mistake. Rather, PEL means, "The appropriate EL of an encounter designed to be a moderate challenge for this party." PEL does NOT scale up according to the number of creatures in the group, as you misstated above-- that is to say, we should not apply Table 2-3 to this group. You've already taken care of the number of creatures in Table 2-5. So to try to sum up and wrap up (unsuccessfully...) and perhaps hint at an easier walkthrough: The EL of this group is, correctly calculated, at EL19. A "50/50" matchup for this group is EL 19 (as you would expect). The appropriate "moderate encounter" for this group is EL 15. (That could be a single CR12 adversary; or it could be 6-7 CR5 adversaries, or it could be 16-31 CR3 adversaries... etc...) You could simply find the EL of the group and then apply that result against a chart showing the breakdown: Encounter EL - Party EL ---> Victory -12 ---> 99.3% -10 ---> 98.4% -8 ---> 96.8% -6 ---> 93.7% -4 ---> 87.5% -2 ---> 75% +/- 0 ---> 50% (encouter level = party's encounter level) +2 ---> 25% +4 ---> 12.5% Finally, according to my calculations, using your system, the "50/50" fight above (PEL 15 vs EL 19) would be worth Party Level (6th) x 1200 experience points, 7200 xp total, 450 xp per character. So how'd I do with all that? Wulf [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
v4: Challenge Ratings pdf (3.5 compatible)
Top