Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="kreynolds" data-source="post: 1571735" data-attributes="member: 2829">Definately.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> Should I included 0-level spells in this?EDIT: It also looks like you rate 0-level spells as half a single spell level. Is that correct?Is this "spells known", such as in the case of the sorcerer? Or is this the number of spells on the class spell list?Understandably.No problem. Definately helpful.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":cool:" title="Cool    :cool:"  data-smilie="6"data-shortname=":cool:" />EDIT: Okay, looks like that formula is definately the ticket. Very helpful indeed! Thanks!  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />EDIT II: But, in the case of spellcasters that don't have a limited list of spells known, such as the wizard or assassin, how do you take that into account when you rate them? It seems as though in the case of the wizard, since you rate it the same as a sorcerer, that you assume 4 spells of each spell level as the maximum. Is that correct?I ask because the ranger/paladin comes out to 0.0096 (or 0.01), but v5 of your doc rates it at 0.02. Has the rating been changed? Does the formula not work with the ranger/paladin? Did I apply it wrong?</blockquote>

Verification