Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Vampire in play
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WalterKovacs" data-source="post: 5557948" data-attributes="member: 63763"><p>A couple things:</p><p> </p><p>(a) You still need to get C/A for suprising charge. Sure, there are easy ways to get it, but charging into C/A does make it a little more difficult (you need to be able to move into position if you intend to charge into a flank, or get the enemy alone for cunning stalker).</p><p> </p><p>(b) Gouge + Suprising Charge is, like the twin strike + immediate reactions/minor actions, sort of set the DPR standard at ridiculous levels. When basically optimization for a striker is: Can you charge? Ok, then you need 17 Dex, multiclass into fighter or rogue (preferably fighter 13 STR/WIS to get the immediate reaction attack in order to increase the DPR) and take suprising charge with a gouge (unless you need to use a light blade, in which case rapier is fine) ... OR go with two weapons, get twin-strike as an elf, multiclass into something that gives you access to more minor/interupt/etc attacks than your class gives you natively ... That's a bit absurd. And thus, if the striker doesn't use weapons, it really has no hope. </p><p> </p><p>Really, not matter WHAT they give a striker, if it's impement based, they aren't going to get Gouge Charging or multi-attacking DPR. The best they can hope for is going the monk/sorceror direction and getting lots of damage via attacking tons of targets. I don't think the vampire stood a chance, especially when they didn't want it to turn into an axe wielding charger or a whirling dervish. </p><p> </p><p>One of the big questions is what exactly is the 'expected' DPR for strikers and the like? In June they are doing an "official" rules update, and sooner or later we'll see the ranger (with his twin strike, etc) getting some updates as well. It's possible that the Vampire is expected to have DPR that while a bit on the low side, but that the top end DPR will be brought down to be more in line with the 'expectation'. It does seem that with the 1/rnd quarry damage/sneak attack/curse and the "no ability modifier" damage for twin strike that they underestimated the value of multi attacks and off standard attacks (the ranger is one of the best DPR in the game and that has pretty much NOTHING to do with their quarry striker mechanic ...) Heck the ammount of nerfing put onto multi-attacks (especially ones that target the same person on each attack) has been nerfed a lot.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WalterKovacs, post: 5557948, member: 63763"] A couple things: (a) You still need to get C/A for suprising charge. Sure, there are easy ways to get it, but charging into C/A does make it a little more difficult (you need to be able to move into position if you intend to charge into a flank, or get the enemy alone for cunning stalker). (b) Gouge + Suprising Charge is, like the twin strike + immediate reactions/minor actions, sort of set the DPR standard at ridiculous levels. When basically optimization for a striker is: Can you charge? Ok, then you need 17 Dex, multiclass into fighter or rogue (preferably fighter 13 STR/WIS to get the immediate reaction attack in order to increase the DPR) and take suprising charge with a gouge (unless you need to use a light blade, in which case rapier is fine) ... OR go with two weapons, get twin-strike as an elf, multiclass into something that gives you access to more minor/interupt/etc attacks than your class gives you natively ... That's a bit absurd. And thus, if the striker doesn't use weapons, it really has no hope. Really, not matter WHAT they give a striker, if it's impement based, they aren't going to get Gouge Charging or multi-attacking DPR. The best they can hope for is going the monk/sorceror direction and getting lots of damage via attacking tons of targets. I don't think the vampire stood a chance, especially when they didn't want it to turn into an axe wielding charger or a whirling dervish. One of the big questions is what exactly is the 'expected' DPR for strikers and the like? In June they are doing an "official" rules update, and sooner or later we'll see the ranger (with his twin strike, etc) getting some updates as well. It's possible that the Vampire is expected to have DPR that while a bit on the low side, but that the top end DPR will be brought down to be more in line with the 'expectation'. It does seem that with the 1/rnd quarry damage/sneak attack/curse and the "no ability modifier" damage for twin strike that they underestimated the value of multi attacks and off standard attacks (the ranger is one of the best DPR in the game and that has pretty much NOTHING to do with their quarry striker mechanic ...) Heck the ammount of nerfing put onto multi-attacks (especially ones that target the same person on each attack) has been nerfed a lot. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Vampire in play
Top