Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
{Vampire: The Masquerade - OOC} New York by Night
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Catulle" data-source="post: 755507" data-attributes="member: 9942"><p>Yeah, I'm a little early and a lot underslept. The ferry was a lot easier coming back and the rugby kept traffic to a minimum. Yay!</p><p></p><p>I think the post before this one illustrates quite well why a degree of filtering is useful in this, and other, examples... I'll do a little quoting, more as an academic exercise in showing how the opposite viewpoint might have been picked up from the same sources (rather than in the interests of prolonging debate).</p><p></p><p></p><p>"in a formal environment"</p><p></p><p>In a formal environment, the same rules are rarely, if ever, applied to the company (guests) and the staff (people being paid to attend) equally. Most everybody would realise that, especially those with relevent etiquette skills, and the fact that that was not being observed could lead to the deduction that this was not a strict formal affair.</p><p></p><p></p><p>"but Cate never answered either of them"</p><p></p><p>Again, this presupposes formality. If the company are talking at length with the staff on non-superficial topics, that formality really goes out of the window. Likewise, if one is to assume formality, for a member of staff to ignore a polite request by a guest is quite the faux pas in and of itself.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Suede, khakis and cardigans are not formalwear...</p><p></p><p></p><p>To assume formality in an informal setting is standoffish (a la Nathaniel)</p><p></p><p></p><p>To assume informality in a formal setting is rude.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Note that Valentine called her 'Cate' as well...</p><p></p><p></p><p>The etiquette skill isn't just about formal etiquette, it's the ability to 'get by' (not necessarily excel) in just about any social situation. The emphasis of the skill represents the culture you're most familiar with (examples include Kindred Society, Formal Dinners, Business and Street Culture).</p><p></p><p></p><p>Of course, when I post, I don't have the time to quote/add each and every sentence spoken to an NPC for fear of clogging - it seems reasonable to assume that the socially-clued-in aren't ignoring anybody (unless indicated that they are), and prevents, well, this kind of circular debate. If it looks unclear, a note here should clear it up.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Now, I'd think that we'd be best off keeping it in mind that the characters' capabilities can (and will) exceed our own (particularly in my case, believe me) and I'd certainly be much more comfortable with a more forgiving environment. That said, I'll seek to clarify whenever a question is raised and try to keep the discord to a minimum.</p><p></p><p>Regards,</p><p></p><p>Barry</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Catulle, post: 755507, member: 9942"] Yeah, I'm a little early and a lot underslept. The ferry was a lot easier coming back and the rugby kept traffic to a minimum. Yay! I think the post before this one illustrates quite well why a degree of filtering is useful in this, and other, examples... I'll do a little quoting, more as an academic exercise in showing how the opposite viewpoint might have been picked up from the same sources (rather than in the interests of prolonging debate). "in a formal environment" In a formal environment, the same rules are rarely, if ever, applied to the company (guests) and the staff (people being paid to attend) equally. Most everybody would realise that, especially those with relevent etiquette skills, and the fact that that was not being observed could lead to the deduction that this was not a strict formal affair. "but Cate never answered either of them" Again, this presupposes formality. If the company are talking at length with the staff on non-superficial topics, that formality really goes out of the window. Likewise, if one is to assume formality, for a member of staff to ignore a polite request by a guest is quite the faux pas in and of itself. Suede, khakis and cardigans are not formalwear... To assume formality in an informal setting is standoffish (a la Nathaniel) To assume informality in a formal setting is rude. Note that Valentine called her 'Cate' as well... The etiquette skill isn't just about formal etiquette, it's the ability to 'get by' (not necessarily excel) in just about any social situation. The emphasis of the skill represents the culture you're most familiar with (examples include Kindred Society, Formal Dinners, Business and Street Culture). Of course, when I post, I don't have the time to quote/add each and every sentence spoken to an NPC for fear of clogging - it seems reasonable to assume that the socially-clued-in aren't ignoring anybody (unless indicated that they are), and prevents, well, this kind of circular debate. If it looks unclear, a note here should clear it up. Now, I'd think that we'd be best off keeping it in mind that the characters' capabilities can (and will) exceed our own (particularly in my case, believe me) and I'd certainly be much more comfortable with a more forgiving environment. That said, I'll seek to clarify whenever a question is raised and try to keep the discord to a minimum. Regards, Barry [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
{Vampire: The Masquerade - OOC} New York by Night
Top