Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Thanee" data-source="post: 1532679" data-attributes="member: 478">Yeah. Highlander 2. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Havn't seen the Hulk, but I'm sure it would also end up on that level.Oh, and don't forget Matrix 3.Also the awful Final Fantasy movie, which had nice computer graphics but well... nothing else. Nice computer graphics alone don't make a movie.It surely wasn't that bad.Well, actually I don't care. I don't care if the CGI is the best in the world or not. In van Helsing, while there certainly was a lot of CGI, it seemed good enough most of the time. Most of the computer animated stuff looked pretty cool and worked fairly well, really.What made the movie so fun for me was the combination of fast pace, a decent (altho quite simple) story, which was pretty much consistent and not completely random, cool characters, great scenery and costumes. All this together as a whole make the movie as entertaining as it was.*shrug*I just wanted to see a fun, entertaining movie, and that was what I got.It surely wasn't the best or even one of the best movies I have ever seen, but it surely was way above the average stuff that finds its way into the cinema.ByeThanee</blockquote>