Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Variant 5e XP system: making higher levels take longer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stormhound" data-source="post: 6372573" data-attributes="member: 22628"><p>As usual, I'm not perfectly happy with the RAW (Rules As Written) XP table provided; I rather like having later levels take longer to acquire, which makes them more meaningful (and somewhat rarer). This stems largely from my more old-school notion that a campaign is an open-ended affair, rather than being like a book series where you're trying to work your way through the plot to reach the end and go on to the next set of books. This is admittedly a radical (or rather, reactionary) concept in modern gaming, but it's what spurred my thinking.</p><p></p><p>For those who want to see all the fiddly numbers I went through, I've attached an image of the spreadsheet...but here's the basic table along with a column which shows the number of "Adventuring Days" required to reach a level using the RAW XP guidelines.</p><p></p><p>[table="width: 400, class: grid, align: center"]</p><p>[tr]</p><p> [td]Level[/td]</p><p> [td]XP Required[/td]</p><p> [td]Adv. Days[/td]</p><p>[/tr]</p><p>[tr]</p><p> [td]1[/td]</p><p> [td]0[/td]</p><p> [td]0[/td]</p><p>[/tr]</p><p>[tr]</p><p> [td]2[/td]</p><p> [td]500[/td]</p><p> [td]1.67[/td]</p><p>[/tr]</p><p>[tr]</p><p> [td]3[/td]</p><p> [td]2,000[/td]</p><p> [td]2.50[/td]</p><p>[/tr]</p><p>[tr]</p><p> [td]4[/td]</p><p> [td]5,000[/td]</p><p> [td]2.50[/td]</p><p>[/tr]</p><p>[tr]</p><p> [td]5[/td]</p><p> [td]10,000[/td]</p><p> [td]2.94[/td]</p><p>[/tr]</p><p>[tr]</p><p> [td]6[/td]</p><p> [td]20,000[/td]</p><p> [td]2.86[/td]</p><p>[/tr]</p><p>[tr]</p><p> [td]7[/td]</p><p> [td]35,000[/td]</p><p> [td]3.75[/td]</p><p>[/tr]</p><p>[tr]</p><p> [td]8[/td]</p><p> [td]55,000[/td]</p><p> [td]4.00[/td]</p><p>[/tr]</p><p>[tr]</p><p> [td]9[/td]</p><p> [td]80,000[/td]</p><p> [td]4.17[/td]</p><p>[/tr]</p><p>[tr]</p><p> [td]10[/td]</p><p> [td]115,000[/td]</p><p> [td]4.67[/td]</p><p>[/tr]</p><p>[tr]</p><p> [td]11[/td]</p><p> [td]160,000[/td]</p><p> [td]5.00[/td]</p><p>[/tr]</p><p>[tr]</p><p> [td]12[/td]</p><p> [td]215,000[/td]</p><p> [td]5.24[/td]</p><p>[/tr]</p><p>[tr]</p><p> [td]13[/td]</p><p> [td]280,000[/td]</p><p> [td]5.65[/td]</p><p>[/tr]</p><p>[tr]</p><p> [td]14[/td]</p><p> [td]360,000[/td]</p><p> [td]5.93[/td]</p><p>[/tr]</p><p>[tr]</p><p> [td]15[/td]</p><p> [td]455,000[/td]</p><p> [td]6.33[/td]</p><p>[/tr]</p><p>[tr]</p><p> [td]16[/td]</p><p> [td]585,000[/td]</p><p> [td]6.50[/td]</p><p>[/tr]</p><p>[tr]</p><p> [td]17[/td]</p><p> [td]755,000[/td]</p><p> [td]6.80[/td]</p><p>[/tr]</p><p>[tr]</p><p> [td]18[/td]</p><p> [td]970,000[/td]</p><p> [td]7.96[/td]</p><p>[/tr]</p><p>[tr]</p><p> [td]19[/td]</p><p> [td]1,235,000[/td]</p><p> [td]8.83[/td]</p><p>[/tr]</p><p>[tr]</p><p> [td]20[/td]</p><p> [td]1,600,000[/td]</p><p> [td]9.13[/td]</p><p>[/tr]</p><p>[/table]</p><p></p><p>This table satisfies my number-loving side in several ways: Not only does each level require more XP than the previous one to attain, but the rate of increase of the amount required does not decrease as level goes up (the "level 11 glitch" in the RAW table). This also means that adventuring days required tend to move upward as level does (I attribute the one exception to the quirkiness of WoTC's numbers). While the XP required at the high end is substantially higher than the RAW, much of that actually is loaded at the high end...except for level 3, the total XP required is less than double the RAW all the way up to level 11, so it should take only twice as long in player terms to level.</p><p></p><p>While I can already hear players screaming foul, I'll point at columns T-U of my spreadsheet image: </p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]63817[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>The total Adventuring Days required are 57.5 under the RAW; with my table, they are 96.4, which isn't even double. If a campaign is actually fun, playing it twice as long hardly seems like much of a burden...and if it isn't, what's the point?</p><p></p><p>Okay, there's the tinderbox, who's going to light the first match?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stormhound, post: 6372573, member: 22628"] As usual, I'm not perfectly happy with the RAW (Rules As Written) XP table provided; I rather like having later levels take longer to acquire, which makes them more meaningful (and somewhat rarer). This stems largely from my more old-school notion that a campaign is an open-ended affair, rather than being like a book series where you're trying to work your way through the plot to reach the end and go on to the next set of books. This is admittedly a radical (or rather, reactionary) concept in modern gaming, but it's what spurred my thinking. For those who want to see all the fiddly numbers I went through, I've attached an image of the spreadsheet...but here's the basic table along with a column which shows the number of "Adventuring Days" required to reach a level using the RAW XP guidelines. [table="width: 400, class: grid, align: center"] [tr] [td]Level[/td] [td]XP Required[/td] [td]Adv. Days[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]1[/td] [td]0[/td] [td]0[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]2[/td] [td]500[/td] [td]1.67[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]3[/td] [td]2,000[/td] [td]2.50[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]4[/td] [td]5,000[/td] [td]2.50[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]5[/td] [td]10,000[/td] [td]2.94[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]6[/td] [td]20,000[/td] [td]2.86[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]7[/td] [td]35,000[/td] [td]3.75[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]8[/td] [td]55,000[/td] [td]4.00[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]9[/td] [td]80,000[/td] [td]4.17[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]10[/td] [td]115,000[/td] [td]4.67[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]11[/td] [td]160,000[/td] [td]5.00[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]12[/td] [td]215,000[/td] [td]5.24[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]13[/td] [td]280,000[/td] [td]5.65[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]14[/td] [td]360,000[/td] [td]5.93[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]15[/td] [td]455,000[/td] [td]6.33[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]16[/td] [td]585,000[/td] [td]6.50[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]17[/td] [td]755,000[/td] [td]6.80[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]18[/td] [td]970,000[/td] [td]7.96[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]19[/td] [td]1,235,000[/td] [td]8.83[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]20[/td] [td]1,600,000[/td] [td]9.13[/td] [/tr] [/table] This table satisfies my number-loving side in several ways: Not only does each level require more XP than the previous one to attain, but the rate of increase of the amount required does not decrease as level goes up (the "level 11 glitch" in the RAW table). This also means that adventuring days required tend to move upward as level does (I attribute the one exception to the quirkiness of WoTC's numbers). While the XP required at the high end is substantially higher than the RAW, much of that actually is loaded at the high end...except for level 3, the total XP required is less than double the RAW all the way up to level 11, so it should take only twice as long in player terms to level. While I can already hear players screaming foul, I'll point at columns T-U of my spreadsheet image: [ATTACH=CONFIG]63817._xfImport[/ATTACH] The total Adventuring Days required are 57.5 under the RAW; with my table, they are 96.4, which isn't even double. If a campaign is actually fun, playing it twice as long hardly seems like much of a burden...and if it isn't, what's the point? Okay, there's the tinderbox, who's going to light the first match? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Variant 5e XP system: making higher levels take longer
Top