Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Variant: Skills, Backgrounds and Specialties
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kerleth" data-source="post: 5998144" data-attributes="member: 84383"><p>Lowering the DC for a specific character is effectively the same as granting a bonus to their check. It just changes who does the math. It really doesn't solve the issue mentioned in the other thread, which has more to do with the breadth and applicability of any given skill or background. As an independent idea it has merit, though, since from my experience the DM is generally the best with dealing with numbers. The main issue would be that Hard, Easy, Formbidable, and the like aren't actually set DC's but ranges. While the granularity of the game could certainly work at Hard=DC 17 (or whatever the number is), and in many cases will, the corner cases where there might be a slightly harder task at DC 18 or 19 in the current setup wouldn't mesh well with your idea.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kerleth, post: 5998144, member: 84383"] Lowering the DC for a specific character is effectively the same as granting a bonus to their check. It just changes who does the math. It really doesn't solve the issue mentioned in the other thread, which has more to do with the breadth and applicability of any given skill or background. As an independent idea it has merit, though, since from my experience the DM is generally the best with dealing with numbers. The main issue would be that Hard, Easy, Formbidable, and the like aren't actually set DC's but ranges. While the granularity of the game could certainly work at Hard=DC 17 (or whatever the number is), and in many cases will, the corner cases where there might be a slightly harder task at DC 18 or 19 in the current setup wouldn't mesh well with your idea. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Variant: Skills, Backgrounds and Specialties
Top