Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Versatile Expertise, Weapon as an Implement, and Monk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shin Okada" data-source="post: 5291271" data-attributes="member: 1956"><p>I am not trying to do munchkin-reading. I am more a DM than to be a player. Well, these days I usually run 7 games as a DM, and attend 3 games as a player, per month (including some on-line games). I am just trying to see what is the logical RAW reading of the rule. Because when asked by may players, I must be fair and logical.</p><p></p><p>Also, I am just curious about this topic.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I largely doubt if that is even RAI. A monk character can be proficient in more weapons due to their racial traits. And a hybrid monk is proficient in many weapons which the other class gives him proficiency. Also, he can become proficient in more weapons by taking feats or choosing some paragon path.</p><p></p><p>If their intention was "Ki focus, Club, dagger, monk unarmed strike, quarterstaff, shuriken, sling, spear", then they should have wrote so. That will only add another line.</p><p></p><p>As per the current rule text, I cannot think of any way to read that, for example, an Eladrin Monk cannot use a longsword as his focus for monk powers.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The problem is, we have no example or guidance to guess how we should divide those "weapons with which you're proficient" into smaller implement types. </p><p></p><p>There are many classes which use some weapon or weapons as their implements.</p><p></p><p>Some classes, like swordmage, use words like "Any light blade or heavy blade", which are weapon category. On the other hand, some class such as Sorcerer has some specific weapon such as "dagger" as one of their implements. In case of Wizard and Invoker, they have "staff" as one of their implements and the magic item section of PHB mentions that"A staff implement can also function as a magic quarterstaff". There seems to be no default rule to categorize weapon implements.</p><p></p><p>Also, I doubt if that is even that strong if you can have +1 feat bonus to attack rolls with all of the weapons you are proficient in. How often one character use weapons of different category? Also, even if we allow Versatile Master to do this, you must take Weapon Focus for each weapon category if you want to be a master of those weapons. On the other hand, there is a feat called Weapon Master in Dragon 382. This feat expanse the benefit of your weapon focus and weapon expertise into all weapons you are proficient with.</p><p></p><p>If there is some rule or clarification to show the way to categorize monk's weapon implements. But at this moment I just cannot find out any.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shin Okada, post: 5291271, member: 1956"] I am not trying to do munchkin-reading. I am more a DM than to be a player. Well, these days I usually run 7 games as a DM, and attend 3 games as a player, per month (including some on-line games). I am just trying to see what is the logical RAW reading of the rule. Because when asked by may players, I must be fair and logical. Also, I am just curious about this topic. I largely doubt if that is even RAI. A monk character can be proficient in more weapons due to their racial traits. And a hybrid monk is proficient in many weapons which the other class gives him proficiency. Also, he can become proficient in more weapons by taking feats or choosing some paragon path. If their intention was "Ki focus, Club, dagger, monk unarmed strike, quarterstaff, shuriken, sling, spear", then they should have wrote so. That will only add another line. As per the current rule text, I cannot think of any way to read that, for example, an Eladrin Monk cannot use a longsword as his focus for monk powers. The problem is, we have no example or guidance to guess how we should divide those "weapons with which you're proficient" into smaller implement types. There are many classes which use some weapon or weapons as their implements. Some classes, like swordmage, use words like "Any light blade or heavy blade", which are weapon category. On the other hand, some class such as Sorcerer has some specific weapon such as "dagger" as one of their implements. In case of Wizard and Invoker, they have "staff" as one of their implements and the magic item section of PHB mentions that"A staff implement can also function as a magic quarterstaff". There seems to be no default rule to categorize weapon implements. Also, I doubt if that is even that strong if you can have +1 feat bonus to attack rolls with all of the weapons you are proficient in. How often one character use weapons of different category? Also, even if we allow Versatile Master to do this, you must take Weapon Focus for each weapon category if you want to be a master of those weapons. On the other hand, there is a feat called Weapon Master in Dragon 382. This feat expanse the benefit of your weapon focus and weapon expertise into all weapons you are proficient with. If there is some rule or clarification to show the way to categorize monk's weapon implements. But at this moment I just cannot find out any. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Versatile Expertise, Weapon as an Implement, and Monk
Top