Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="satori01" data-source="post: 2874389" data-attributes="member: 7859">This made me laugh, especially given all the discussion on the Extra Spell Feat.&nbsp; In Arcana Evolved all casters can do this without a feat, as Spell Weaving is common feature of the magic system.&nbsp; It is completely balanced, and a very nice feature, bringing up the efficicacy of casters getting to cast the spell they need w/ limited resources.&nbsp; It should also be pointed out that multi classed spell casting classes in AE stack their spell slots and class spell lists, which of course does not happen in D&amp;D.If the feat was intended to be used for a single class' spell slots only shouldnt the feat say something to the effect of &quot; This feat can be selected mutiple times.&nbsp; Each time the feat is taken, chose a spellcasting class to apply it's effect to&quot; or something to that effect alaPractised Spell Caster?This is the troubling part, the feat is so broadly written, you kinda have to think it was done on purpose.&nbsp; Afterall it is clearly based off the AE spell weaving rules, and is called &quot;Versatile Caster&quot;.Else we get into a Princess Bride syndrom where like Indigo, we say to Kestrel, Wilkes, and Liquette (authors of the book), &quot; I do not think it means, what you think it means&quot;. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="satori01, post: 2874389, member: 7859"] This made me laugh, especially given all the discussion on the Extra Spell Feat. In Arcana Evolved all casters can do this without a feat, as Spell Weaving is common feature of the magic system. It is completely balanced, and a very nice feature, bringing up the efficicacy of casters getting to cast the spell they need w/ limited resources. It should also be pointed out that multi classed spell casting classes in AE stack their spell slots and class spell lists, which of course does not happen in D&D. If the feat was intended to be used for a single class' spell slots only shouldnt the feat say something to the effect of " This feat can be selected mutiple times. Each time the feat is taken, chose a spellcasting class to apply it's effect to" or something to that effect ala Practised Spell Caster? This is the troubling part, the feat is so broadly written, you kinda have to think it was done on purpose. Afterall it is clearly based off the AE spell weaving rules, and is called "Versatile Caster". Else we get into a Princess Bride syndrom where like Indigo, we say to Kestrel, Wilkes, and Liquette (authors of the book), " I do not think it means, what you think it means". :) [/QUOTE]

Verification