Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 2875188" data-attributes="member: 2011">It does not explicitly state it.This is an inference that you are making from the words, not a rule that the words explicitly declare.To change a rule, it has to be explicit.This is like PrC abilities. If a PrC ability states "This ability gives the character a +1 bonus per class level", it means the class level of the PrC. It does not mean the class level of any other class the character might have. It has to explicitly state that it applies to other classes for it to do so.When this feat states "You can use two spell slots of the same level to cast a spell you know that is one level higher", it means spell slots of the same class that is being used to cast the higher level spell. It does not mean the spell slots of any other class the character might have. It has to explicitly state that it applies to other classes for it to do so.No difference.Here is the difference between our points of view. Mine is that if the feat is going to change a rule, it must explicitly say so. Implicit rules changes do not count. Yours is that if the wording of the feat can be interpreted in multiple different ways, then any of the interpretations is valid.</blockquote>