Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Rienen" data-source="post: 5281021" data-attributes="member: 84977">Heh, x2 here! It was implemented so well, WotC tried to get away with claiming they did the same for their VTT. (By stealing the image and mocking it up in promo materials).I have, admittedly, only played around with Maptools. The major differences I saw was Maptools was much better at map/battle space manipulation, and FGII was much better at Character Sheet manipulation. As my playgroup is very role-play oriented, opposed to combat oriented groups, it just worked better. I think it boils down to what fits best to your groups playstyle.Some VTT's are better at displaying and moving tokens, some provide for a richer &quot;sit around the table with your character sheet&quot; experience. FGII fit my group better. FGII has gotten better at combat (the combat tracker built into several rulesets has been a god-send) and I'm told others have gotten better at handling character sheets. Your mileage may vary.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Rienen, post: 5281021, member: 84977"] Heh, x2 here! It was implemented so well, WotC tried to get away with claiming they did the same for their VTT. (By stealing the image and mocking it up in promo materials). I have, admittedly, only played around with Maptools. The major differences I saw was Maptools was much better at map/battle space manipulation, and FGII was much better at Character Sheet manipulation. As my playgroup is very role-play oriented, opposed to combat oriented groups, it just worked better. I think it boils down to what fits best to your groups playstyle. Some VTT's are better at displaying and moving tokens, some provide for a richer "sit around the table with your character sheet" experience. FGII fit my group better. FGII has gotten better at combat (the combat tracker built into several rulesets has been a god-send) and I'm told others have gotten better at handling character sheets. Your mileage may vary. [/QUOTE]

Verification