Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Visions of Avarice trivializes melee encounters?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 4811641" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>Patterns and Phantasms sat closely to Enchantment.</p><p></p><p>Figments and Glamars were image effects that did not affect the mind at all and could be seen by everyone. No mind affecting.</p><p></p><p>Shadow illusions was weak version of reality. No mind affecting.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I would have no problem with this either if that were the rule.</p><p></p><p>It isn't.</p><p></p><p>I really think that the designers could have sat down and carefully figured this type of thing out.</p><p></p><p>If they wanted illusions to be compulsion, fine. Do so. Protections vs. mind affects would then apply.</p><p></p><p>But they already have a Charm effect for that. So, why is an Illusion like Visions of Avarice doing a Charm effect without the Charm keyword?</p><p></p><p>The Illusions section of Arcane Power claims that it affects the foe's mind, but then there are no game mechanics for protecting against that.</p><p></p><p>Disguise Self is an illusion, but it appears to be a Figment or Glamer, not an Arcane Power mind affecting illusion.</p><p></p><p>The Monster Manual has immune to illusion monsters. Does that mean that the monsters are immune to the entire power, or are they still affected by psychic damage? Presumably, Psychic is not the same as Illusion. But, what part of a power is illusion and what part is psychic. Is psychic just the damage part and other conditions are illusion? Who knows? There are no set rules TMK.</p><p></p><p>How about the Insight skill (sensing an illusion) versus a mental illusion like Visions of Avarice? Where are the rules on this?</p><p></p><p>But from what I can tell for Arcane Power, they sort of, kind of, pulled the 3.5 Enchantment school of magic into the 3.5 Illusion school of magic (mostly Pattern / Phantasm) and then threw out some portion of the 3.5 Illusion school of magic (Figments / Glamers, and Shadowmagic, not completely, but partially) and then said "Done" without figuring out how that affects the rest of the game system.</p><p></p><p>They didn't even bother to compare Players Handbook Illusion magic with Arcane Power Illusion magic.</p><p></p><p>The former is Figment / Glamer type illusions and the latter is Patterns / Phantasms. How do they interact? Nobody knows.</p><p></p><p>It's a bit jarring and pretty lame that they didn't take the time out to come up with a clean comprehensive system. IMO. They ignored the Charm and Illusion keywords in the PHB and made up a new combined Charm/Illusion keyword called Illusion. But Illusion in Arcane Power is not the same as the Illusion keyword in the PHB.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yup. A DM can make up his own rules on it. A DM can ignore it all (no charm in the illusion spell = no bonus to saves for an Eladrin).</p><p></p><p>I just think they dropped the ball big time. This could have been handled so much cleaner.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 4811641, member: 2011"] Patterns and Phantasms sat closely to Enchantment. Figments and Glamars were image effects that did not affect the mind at all and could be seen by everyone. No mind affecting. Shadow illusions was weak version of reality. No mind affecting. I would have no problem with this either if that were the rule. It isn't. I really think that the designers could have sat down and carefully figured this type of thing out. If they wanted illusions to be compulsion, fine. Do so. Protections vs. mind affects would then apply. But they already have a Charm effect for that. So, why is an Illusion like Visions of Avarice doing a Charm effect without the Charm keyword? The Illusions section of Arcane Power claims that it affects the foe's mind, but then there are no game mechanics for protecting against that. Disguise Self is an illusion, but it appears to be a Figment or Glamer, not an Arcane Power mind affecting illusion. The Monster Manual has immune to illusion monsters. Does that mean that the monsters are immune to the entire power, or are they still affected by psychic damage? Presumably, Psychic is not the same as Illusion. But, what part of a power is illusion and what part is psychic. Is psychic just the damage part and other conditions are illusion? Who knows? There are no set rules TMK. How about the Insight skill (sensing an illusion) versus a mental illusion like Visions of Avarice? Where are the rules on this? But from what I can tell for Arcane Power, they sort of, kind of, pulled the 3.5 Enchantment school of magic into the 3.5 Illusion school of magic (mostly Pattern / Phantasm) and then threw out some portion of the 3.5 Illusion school of magic (Figments / Glamers, and Shadowmagic, not completely, but partially) and then said "Done" without figuring out how that affects the rest of the game system. They didn't even bother to compare Players Handbook Illusion magic with Arcane Power Illusion magic. The former is Figment / Glamer type illusions and the latter is Patterns / Phantasms. How do they interact? Nobody knows. It's a bit jarring and pretty lame that they didn't take the time out to come up with a clean comprehensive system. IMO. They ignored the Charm and Illusion keywords in the PHB and made up a new combined Charm/Illusion keyword called Illusion. But Illusion in Arcane Power is not the same as the Illusion keyword in the PHB. Yup. A DM can make up his own rules on it. A DM can ignore it all (no charm in the illusion spell = no bonus to saves for an Eladrin). I just think they dropped the ball big time. This could have been handled so much cleaner. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Visions of Avarice trivializes melee encounters?
Top