Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Volo's Guide to Monsters: General Discussion.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 6939082" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>So… I had to stop reading this and walk away for a moment.</p><p> </p><p>If this is the perspective your working from, I think I get why you are so frustrated and angry.</p><p> </p><p>This is nothing like what I said or meant. I spent hours in my session zero going over the world and details that the characters would obviously know. I despise my PCs not knowing the rules of the world, because then they can’t act in character, they can’t explore what their particular niche in the world is if they don’t understand it.</p><p> </p><p>Know what I didn’t tell them? I didn’t tell them the history of a minor goddess who has no temple in their Tower City, but when a player rolled a ridicously high religion check, I told him of how she ascended to godhood after losing a 1v1 fight against a god called Bane.</p><p> </p><p>When they encountered a Remorhaz in a dungeon, I had them roll. They would never have encountered this creature in their homes, it isn’t even native to the area they were in, it was something brought in by a 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] party. They didn’t roll high enough to learn much, but I did say the the one person had seen pictures of them before and knew that this one was an infant.</p><p>I told every single player about the fact that the ruler of their tower appears human, but has been the guy in charge for over a thousand years.</p><p> </p><p>I told all of them about the High Nobel house which is the sole banking organization for the Tower, and writes contracts that include the use of dead bodies as collateral, because they are necromancers and use the zombies as slave labor to cover debts, they also charge insane interest rates and debt can travel through generations of families.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>So, do me a small favor. Next time you feel the urge to rant about how terrible my style of play is, step back and think if you <strong> actually know</strong> what my style of play is. Because false accusations aren’t conducive to an actual discussion.</p><p> </p><p>I’ll go back to reading the rest of your post now.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>There are a few ways to handle this.</p><p> </p><p>Ask for a bit of extra time, or pretend to check your notes while thinking up an answer.</p><p>If it doesn’t matter to the adventure, then your answer doesn’t matter.</p><p>Who were the last 5 champions? Well, Heiroch the Shield is the current reigning champ, has been for six years running. Before that was Draun the Axecrusher, and before him was Trachel the Blade who took the title from his father Illishthen the Blade. The fifth would be the first champion of the Stonefist Arena, Took Stonefist, who held the title until he was found dead of poisoning in this very bar.</p><p> </p><p>Took me about 3 minutes to come up with all that. Mostly because I am utterly terrible with coming up with names. Literally my weakest point as a DM.</p><p> </p><p>Secondly, admit you don’t know off the top of your head and ask them why they want to know. If they just want to flesh out the setting and have no immediate use for the information, tell them you’ll write something up and give it to them next session.</p><p> </p><p>I understand that as a writer, I’m more comfortable building a lot of lore and world compared to others, but just because you may not know the answer to every question doesn’t mean those skills can’t be used. After all, if the goal is to ambush the tax man, you can tell them they know when he is arriving and that they can wait the 3 weeks until his next scheduled stop. If they don’t feel like waiting 3 weeks, then you move on, you don’t need more detail than that until things move forward.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>Unless they decide to do it that way. Nothing in the rules against it.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>You really see things in a very adversarial light don’t you.</p><p> </p><p>It kind of amuses me to a point, do you think that if one person isn’t trained in stealth or wears heavy armor they should retrain their character, because if only one person fails a stealth check the entire campaign could grind to a screeching halt because the only way forward was to sneak past the guards?</p><p> </p><p>Of course not, lying and fighting are options. Hey, what if someone wanted to roll History to see if there could be an official reason to be in here? I don’t know if there is, but it might be a fun roll to make. Will people get angry at them for wasting everyone’s time, or will they be curious if that is the answer to the problem.</p><p> </p><p>I’ve played with DMs where there was only one correct answer, and going the wrong way ground everything to a halt and made everything horrible, but just because a skill isn’t an “I win” button doesn’t mean it isn’t useful, just because someone else is good at something doesn’t mean your time was wasted, though I try to make players aware if they are stepping on too many toes, after all, some people get territorial about their niches.</p><p> </p><p>And you know, I don’t need to do anything about splitting the party. Not only will they do it for me, but why on Earth would an elf know about the layout of the hobgoblin city they are infiltrating? That’s a history check I’d let a hobgoblin make, but not neccesarily anyone else. And, it could be great rping that Hobgoblins don’t like to split the party, move as a unit, fight as a unit. Makes perfect sense for them.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>A handful of things.</p><p>1) If the players ask to search a room, I am going to ask for investigation. That is what the skill is meant for, if everyone you’ve ever played with wants perception instead… well, homebrew is fine, but that isn’t what that skill is meant for. I remember when talking about my player crafting items you were very clear that homebrew rules weren’t something we should be using to compare, and yet that is exactly what you are talking about, people homebrewing to make the skill less useful</p><p> </p><p>2) You didn’t address the fact the PHB actually calls for more specificity from Perception, not Investigation</p><p> </p><p>3) Out of curiosity, how is “Do I see anything down this hallway?” “Is there anything interesting in this room” “Do I see where he might have stashed the loot” ect less pestering if the DM replies “Roll perception” than if they reply “Roll Investigation”?</p><p> </p><p>You’re talking like people need to constantly ask for one, but they never need to ask for the other, bu =t your examples seem overwhelmingly to require them to ask no matter what?</p><p> </p><p>4) Do you honestly see so much use of Medicine? I’m playing a doctor character (Gnome Life Cleric) and I’ve only used Medicine a handful of times, I never would have pegged it as one of the big skills.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Honestly, I can barely follow half of what you’re saying.</p><p> </p><p>They get an ability comparable to a class ability and it is absolute crap?</p><p> </p><p>You want a Fighter Hobgoblin that is viable, and just as good as a Mountain Dwarf? Sure, I’ll throw together one real fast, just base stats though, not taking the time to list all the abilities. I’ll even throw in a non-variant human, just for fun.</p><p> </p><p>[sblock]</p><p>Hobgoblin Fighter lv 1</p><p>Hp: 13 AC: 18</p><p>Str: 15 (+2) Dex: 10 (+0) Con 16 (+3) Int: 14 (+2) Wis 12 (+1) Cha 8 (-1)</p><p> </p><p>Shield and Longsword +4 1d8+2</p><p> </p><p>Dwarf Fighter lv 1</p><p>Hp: 13 AC: 18</p><p>Str: 17 (+3) Dex: 10 (+0) Con 16 (+3) Int: 13 (+1) Wis 12 (+1) Cha 8 (-1)</p><p> </p><p>Shield and Longsword +5 1d8+3</p><p> </p><p>Human Fighter lv 1</p><p>Hp: 12 AC: 18</p><p>Str: 16 (+3) Dex: 11 (+0) Con 15 (+2) Int: 14 (+2) Wis 13 (+1) Cha 9 (-1)</p><p> </p><p>Shield and Longsword +5 1d8+3</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Nearly identical, all are viable to play, I could have fun with any, even if the others were in the party. Let’s say they hit 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] and continue being identical?</p><p> </p><p>Hobgoblin Fighter Eldritch Knight lv 3</p><p>Hp: 31 AC: 18</p><p>Str: 15 (+2) Dex: 10 (+0) Con 16 (+3) Int: 14 (+2) Wis 12 (+1) Cha 8 (-1)</p><p> </p><p>Shield and Longsword +4 1d8+2</p><p> </p><p>Dwarf Fighter Eldritch Knight lv 3</p><p>Hp: 31 AC: 18</p><p>Str: 17 (+3) Dex: 10 (+0) Con 16 (+3) Int: 13 (+1) Wis 12 (+1) Cha 8 (-1)</p><p> </p><p>Shield and Longsword +5 1d8+3</p><p> </p><p>Human Fighter lv 1</p><p>Hp: 29 AC: 18</p><p>Str: 16 (+3) Dex: 11 (+0) Con 15 (+2) Int: 14 (+2) Wis 13 (+1) Cha 9 (-1)</p><p> </p><p>Shield and Longsword +5 1d8+3</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Of course, could have gone Battlemaster, nothing prevents it. Even fits really well, by 4[SUP]th[/SUP] grab a feat that includes a +1 strength, like Athlete or Heavy Armor Master to hit even numbers, unless playing the human. And you’re off to the races [/sblock]</p><p> </p><p>Now, I admit, I haven’t looked back at the preview information in a bit, so I didn’t know that Lizardfolk and Kenku (both found in the Monster Manual as Monsters) didn’t get listed as Monstrous Races. I remembered Lizardfolk getting a large write u beside Orcs and Gnolls and Yuan-TI and Illithids, you, as monsters, so I figured they were in that list as well.</p><p> </p><p>But again, considering that there is a document on GM’s Guild which specifically makes it legal to play Hobgoblins, Bugbears, Yuan-Ti, and all the rest… I have to say you are dead wrong that they created these races so poorly so they would be auto-banned at all tables.</p><p> </p><p>They are not banned at official tables, so Wizards must think they did something right, or they are conspiring against you, your choice I suppose.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 6939082, member: 6801228"] So… I had to stop reading this and walk away for a moment. If this is the perspective your working from, I think I get why you are so frustrated and angry. This is nothing like what I said or meant. I spent hours in my session zero going over the world and details that the characters would obviously know. I despise my PCs not knowing the rules of the world, because then they can’t act in character, they can’t explore what their particular niche in the world is if they don’t understand it. Know what I didn’t tell them? I didn’t tell them the history of a minor goddess who has no temple in their Tower City, but when a player rolled a ridicously high religion check, I told him of how she ascended to godhood after losing a 1v1 fight against a god called Bane. When they encountered a Remorhaz in a dungeon, I had them roll. They would never have encountered this creature in their homes, it isn’t even native to the area they were in, it was something brought in by a 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] party. They didn’t roll high enough to learn much, but I did say the the one person had seen pictures of them before and knew that this one was an infant. I told every single player about the fact that the ruler of their tower appears human, but has been the guy in charge for over a thousand years. I told all of them about the High Nobel house which is the sole banking organization for the Tower, and writes contracts that include the use of dead bodies as collateral, because they are necromancers and use the zombies as slave labor to cover debts, they also charge insane interest rates and debt can travel through generations of families. So, do me a small favor. Next time you feel the urge to rant about how terrible my style of play is, step back and think if you [b] actually know[/b] what my style of play is. Because false accusations aren’t conducive to an actual discussion. I’ll go back to reading the rest of your post now. There are a few ways to handle this. Ask for a bit of extra time, or pretend to check your notes while thinking up an answer. If it doesn’t matter to the adventure, then your answer doesn’t matter. Who were the last 5 champions? Well, Heiroch the Shield is the current reigning champ, has been for six years running. Before that was Draun the Axecrusher, and before him was Trachel the Blade who took the title from his father Illishthen the Blade. The fifth would be the first champion of the Stonefist Arena, Took Stonefist, who held the title until he was found dead of poisoning in this very bar. Took me about 3 minutes to come up with all that. Mostly because I am utterly terrible with coming up with names. Literally my weakest point as a DM. Secondly, admit you don’t know off the top of your head and ask them why they want to know. If they just want to flesh out the setting and have no immediate use for the information, tell them you’ll write something up and give it to them next session. I understand that as a writer, I’m more comfortable building a lot of lore and world compared to others, but just because you may not know the answer to every question doesn’t mean those skills can’t be used. After all, if the goal is to ambush the tax man, you can tell them they know when he is arriving and that they can wait the 3 weeks until his next scheduled stop. If they don’t feel like waiting 3 weeks, then you move on, you don’t need more detail than that until things move forward. Unless they decide to do it that way. Nothing in the rules against it. You really see things in a very adversarial light don’t you. It kind of amuses me to a point, do you think that if one person isn’t trained in stealth or wears heavy armor they should retrain their character, because if only one person fails a stealth check the entire campaign could grind to a screeching halt because the only way forward was to sneak past the guards? Of course not, lying and fighting are options. Hey, what if someone wanted to roll History to see if there could be an official reason to be in here? I don’t know if there is, but it might be a fun roll to make. Will people get angry at them for wasting everyone’s time, or will they be curious if that is the answer to the problem. I’ve played with DMs where there was only one correct answer, and going the wrong way ground everything to a halt and made everything horrible, but just because a skill isn’t an “I win” button doesn’t mean it isn’t useful, just because someone else is good at something doesn’t mean your time was wasted, though I try to make players aware if they are stepping on too many toes, after all, some people get territorial about their niches. And you know, I don’t need to do anything about splitting the party. Not only will they do it for me, but why on Earth would an elf know about the layout of the hobgoblin city they are infiltrating? That’s a history check I’d let a hobgoblin make, but not neccesarily anyone else. And, it could be great rping that Hobgoblins don’t like to split the party, move as a unit, fight as a unit. Makes perfect sense for them. A handful of things. 1) If the players ask to search a room, I am going to ask for investigation. That is what the skill is meant for, if everyone you’ve ever played with wants perception instead… well, homebrew is fine, but that isn’t what that skill is meant for. I remember when talking about my player crafting items you were very clear that homebrew rules weren’t something we should be using to compare, and yet that is exactly what you are talking about, people homebrewing to make the skill less useful 2) You didn’t address the fact the PHB actually calls for more specificity from Perception, not Investigation 3) Out of curiosity, how is “Do I see anything down this hallway?” “Is there anything interesting in this room” “Do I see where he might have stashed the loot” ect less pestering if the DM replies “Roll perception” than if they reply “Roll Investigation”? You’re talking like people need to constantly ask for one, but they never need to ask for the other, bu =t your examples seem overwhelmingly to require them to ask no matter what? 4) Do you honestly see so much use of Medicine? I’m playing a doctor character (Gnome Life Cleric) and I’ve only used Medicine a handful of times, I never would have pegged it as one of the big skills. Honestly, I can barely follow half of what you’re saying. They get an ability comparable to a class ability and it is absolute crap? You want a Fighter Hobgoblin that is viable, and just as good as a Mountain Dwarf? Sure, I’ll throw together one real fast, just base stats though, not taking the time to list all the abilities. I’ll even throw in a non-variant human, just for fun. [sblock] Hobgoblin Fighter lv 1 Hp: 13 AC: 18 Str: 15 (+2) Dex: 10 (+0) Con 16 (+3) Int: 14 (+2) Wis 12 (+1) Cha 8 (-1) Shield and Longsword +4 1d8+2 Dwarf Fighter lv 1 Hp: 13 AC: 18 Str: 17 (+3) Dex: 10 (+0) Con 16 (+3) Int: 13 (+1) Wis 12 (+1) Cha 8 (-1) Shield and Longsword +5 1d8+3 Human Fighter lv 1 Hp: 12 AC: 18 Str: 16 (+3) Dex: 11 (+0) Con 15 (+2) Int: 14 (+2) Wis 13 (+1) Cha 9 (-1) Shield and Longsword +5 1d8+3 Nearly identical, all are viable to play, I could have fun with any, even if the others were in the party. Let’s say they hit 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] and continue being identical? Hobgoblin Fighter Eldritch Knight lv 3 Hp: 31 AC: 18 Str: 15 (+2) Dex: 10 (+0) Con 16 (+3) Int: 14 (+2) Wis 12 (+1) Cha 8 (-1) Shield and Longsword +4 1d8+2 Dwarf Fighter Eldritch Knight lv 3 Hp: 31 AC: 18 Str: 17 (+3) Dex: 10 (+0) Con 16 (+3) Int: 13 (+1) Wis 12 (+1) Cha 8 (-1) Shield and Longsword +5 1d8+3 Human Fighter lv 1 Hp: 29 AC: 18 Str: 16 (+3) Dex: 11 (+0) Con 15 (+2) Int: 14 (+2) Wis 13 (+1) Cha 9 (-1) Shield and Longsword +5 1d8+3 Of course, could have gone Battlemaster, nothing prevents it. Even fits really well, by 4[SUP]th[/SUP] grab a feat that includes a +1 strength, like Athlete or Heavy Armor Master to hit even numbers, unless playing the human. And you’re off to the races [/sblock] Now, I admit, I haven’t looked back at the preview information in a bit, so I didn’t know that Lizardfolk and Kenku (both found in the Monster Manual as Monsters) didn’t get listed as Monstrous Races. I remembered Lizardfolk getting a large write u beside Orcs and Gnolls and Yuan-TI and Illithids, you, as monsters, so I figured they were in that list as well. But again, considering that there is a document on GM’s Guild which specifically makes it legal to play Hobgoblins, Bugbears, Yuan-Ti, and all the rest… I have to say you are dead wrong that they created these races so poorly so they would be auto-banned at all tables. They are not banned at official tables, so Wizards must think they did something right, or they are conspiring against you, your choice I suppose. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Volo's Guide to Monsters: General Discussion.
Top