Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
<Volume 1 Review> The inevitable comparison
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GF Jeff" data-source="post: 85269" data-attributes="member: 234"><p>Thank you for the kind words, Erik. You correctly point out that Dragon is the magazine for D&D, not the d20 System, which is why we created Gaming Frontiers in the first place. Dragon is, and always will be, the standard by which all others are judged, even those products that skew a little sideways like ours. Dragon and Polyhedron are fine magazines, and ones which everyone in these offices reads monthly, just like every other D&D gamer out there.</p><p></p><p>Straight comparisons between GF and Dragon are definitely not something we would encourage, especially considering that we consider GF to be a d20 publisher's digest (and not a magazine - as Jim Goings points out - what magazine has 7 pages of ads?), but since several online reviewers and forum members don't seem to understand the concept, we were happy to see someone use the reverse argument for once.</p><p></p><p>What befuddles me most is when folks say, "Gaming Frontiers is too expensive. Get more money from ads to bring the price." I don't understand this logic. What are they saying? They want to pay less, but also have less content? If we charged upwards of $2000 for ad space like Dragon does (and rightfully so, it IS a magazine after all, with a reader base and circulation that justifies the ad cost), then we could certainly afford to bring down the price, but that would also mean compromising the amount of space we allot for content (not to mention sacrifice our business model). If you want more, you pay more, it's that simple. Asking us to include more ads in order to bring down the price is something I don't think I'll ever understand. It's like saying, "There's too much content. I'd rather pay less and have less stuff."</p><p></p><p>Your "sampling" idea is exactly how we (the United Playtest staff) think of Gaming Frontiers. Many folks have pointed out that they were turned on to new companies by way of Volume 1, and that was our intention.</p><p></p><p>I would like to congratulate you on the exemplary job you do, month in and month out, on your publications, as they continue to have a loyal following out here in the hinterlands. I wish good luck to you as well as you continue doing what you love. It shows.</p><p></p><p>Thanks again,</p><p></p><p>Jeffrey S. Carter</p><p>Head Writer / Assistant Editor</p><p>Gaming Frontiers</p><p><a href="http://www.gamingfrontiers.com" target="_blank">www.gamingfrontiers.com</a></p><p>United Playtest, Inc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GF Jeff, post: 85269, member: 234"] Thank you for the kind words, Erik. You correctly point out that Dragon is the magazine for D&D, not the d20 System, which is why we created Gaming Frontiers in the first place. Dragon is, and always will be, the standard by which all others are judged, even those products that skew a little sideways like ours. Dragon and Polyhedron are fine magazines, and ones which everyone in these offices reads monthly, just like every other D&D gamer out there. Straight comparisons between GF and Dragon are definitely not something we would encourage, especially considering that we consider GF to be a d20 publisher's digest (and not a magazine - as Jim Goings points out - what magazine has 7 pages of ads?), but since several online reviewers and forum members don't seem to understand the concept, we were happy to see someone use the reverse argument for once. What befuddles me most is when folks say, "Gaming Frontiers is too expensive. Get more money from ads to bring the price." I don't understand this logic. What are they saying? They want to pay less, but also have less content? If we charged upwards of $2000 for ad space like Dragon does (and rightfully so, it IS a magazine after all, with a reader base and circulation that justifies the ad cost), then we could certainly afford to bring down the price, but that would also mean compromising the amount of space we allot for content (not to mention sacrifice our business model). If you want more, you pay more, it's that simple. Asking us to include more ads in order to bring down the price is something I don't think I'll ever understand. It's like saying, "There's too much content. I'd rather pay less and have less stuff." Your "sampling" idea is exactly how we (the United Playtest staff) think of Gaming Frontiers. Many folks have pointed out that they were turned on to new companies by way of Volume 1, and that was our intention. I would like to congratulate you on the exemplary job you do, month in and month out, on your publications, as they continue to have a loyal following out here in the hinterlands. I wish good luck to you as well as you continue doing what you love. It shows. Thanks again, Jeffrey S. Carter Head Writer / Assistant Editor Gaming Frontiers [url]www.gamingfrontiers.com[/url] United Playtest, Inc. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
<Volume 1 Review> The inevitable comparison
Top