Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Voluntarily failing saves when spellcasters lie
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="irdeggman" data-source="post: 3736542" data-attributes="member: 16285"><p>I agree with Hyp pretty much entirely here.</p><p></p><p>If a character decides to forgo his saving throw then he can't change his mind. Spellcraft checks used against spells being cast only help when counterspelling (and that is a ready action). In this case the character would have used his action to "not save". You can't decide to actively defend yourself once someone has already hit you with a sword (to avoid being hit from that blow) - spells work the same way. You are not casting all round for a standard action spell - the casting and the result happen effectively at the same time.</p><p></p><p>But he doesn't have to say that. A hamless spell works differently than others and the character shouldn't be "forced" to choose. He could be "enticed" to think he has to choose, but if he has been healed before he would "know" that the spell works even if he is unconscious (and can't actively choose to forgo his saving throw). </p><p></p><p>Also Slay Living requires a melee touch attack. It does not state touch it states melee touch attack. I know it is rather rules-lawery but it is not handled the same as a cure spell (that only requires the touch attack if the recipient is in melee).</p><p></p><p>I also assume the doppleganger had the spell memorized since he can't freely swap it out. Looks too contrived (at at the last minute) to me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="irdeggman, post: 3736542, member: 16285"] I agree with Hyp pretty much entirely here. If a character decides to forgo his saving throw then he can't change his mind. Spellcraft checks used against spells being cast only help when counterspelling (and that is a ready action). In this case the character would have used his action to "not save". You can't decide to actively defend yourself once someone has already hit you with a sword (to avoid being hit from that blow) - spells work the same way. You are not casting all round for a standard action spell - the casting and the result happen effectively at the same time. But he doesn't have to say that. A hamless spell works differently than others and the character shouldn't be "forced" to choose. He could be "enticed" to think he has to choose, but if he has been healed before he would "know" that the spell works even if he is unconscious (and can't actively choose to forgo his saving throw). Also Slay Living requires a melee touch attack. It does not state touch it states melee touch attack. I know it is rather rules-lawery but it is not handled the same as a cure spell (that only requires the touch attack if the recipient is in melee). I also assume the doppleganger had the spell memorized since he can't freely swap it out. Looks too contrived (at at the last minute) to me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Voluntarily failing saves when spellcasters lie
Top