Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Vop vs spell casting materials
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dimwhit" data-source="post: 2785250" data-attributes="member: 2576"><p>OK, for all you literalists, I'll state my position--despite the fact that I still see this as a DM's call and a pointless argument. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>You really have to define 'value' in terms of VoP. I don't see it as black and white. In many cases, what's valuable for one person is worthless for another. Examples: Divine Focus, spellbook. A magic sword, however, can be picked up by any member of a party and used (yes, there are exceptions).</p><p></p><p>A spell book, IMO, is more part of a class feature than an item of value, like a sword, that enhances existing class features (those being, in the case of a fighter, combat prowess). A Wizard without a spellbook is worthless (Spell Mastery notwithstanding). Spellbooks have no intrinsic value. Their only value is to spellcasters who can put it to use--again just a function of a class feature. As opposed to a +5 vorpal (I can't believe I'm entertaining this one), which does have intrinsic value. It's sellable to anyone and usable by most. It's not tied to a particular character/class.</p><p></p><p>So does it violate VoP to allow a spellbook? By RAW, perhaps. Why? Well, it's not listed in among the items permissible (though neither is a divine focus, but I'd certainly allow that). Also, it has value. I don't recall, however, that the VoP disallows items of 'value.' It doesn't say "you can't have anything worth more than 10gp" or anything to that effect. Why? My opinion is that VoP is very much a 'spririt of the concept' thing. Was VoP written so that Wizards can't take the vow? So that Clerics who take it can't use a divine focus? Maybe. I, however, don't see it that way, so I would rule as a DM that they're allowed; however, I would pay careful attention as to how the character uses that liberty. If they remain within my view of the spirit behind VoP, that's cool. However, if that Wizard then starts bumming scrolls from party treasure so he can stock his spellbook...well, he might find that book mysteriously gone in the middle of the night. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>So there you have it. Not sure if I adequately summed up my position, but I want to go home now, so that's what you get.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dimwhit, post: 2785250, member: 2576"] OK, for all you literalists, I'll state my position--despite the fact that I still see this as a DM's call and a pointless argument. ;) You really have to define 'value' in terms of VoP. I don't see it as black and white. In many cases, what's valuable for one person is worthless for another. Examples: Divine Focus, spellbook. A magic sword, however, can be picked up by any member of a party and used (yes, there are exceptions). A spell book, IMO, is more part of a class feature than an item of value, like a sword, that enhances existing class features (those being, in the case of a fighter, combat prowess). A Wizard without a spellbook is worthless (Spell Mastery notwithstanding). Spellbooks have no intrinsic value. Their only value is to spellcasters who can put it to use--again just a function of a class feature. As opposed to a +5 vorpal (I can't believe I'm entertaining this one), which does have intrinsic value. It's sellable to anyone and usable by most. It's not tied to a particular character/class. So does it violate VoP to allow a spellbook? By RAW, perhaps. Why? Well, it's not listed in among the items permissible (though neither is a divine focus, but I'd certainly allow that). Also, it has value. I don't recall, however, that the VoP disallows items of 'value.' It doesn't say "you can't have anything worth more than 10gp" or anything to that effect. Why? My opinion is that VoP is very much a 'spririt of the concept' thing. Was VoP written so that Wizards can't take the vow? So that Clerics who take it can't use a divine focus? Maybe. I, however, don't see it that way, so I would rule as a DM that they're allowed; however, I would pay careful attention as to how the character uses that liberty. If they remain within my view of the spirit behind VoP, that's cool. However, if that Wizard then starts bumming scrolls from party treasure so he can stock his spellbook...well, he might find that book mysteriously gone in the middle of the night. :) So there you have it. Not sure if I adequately summed up my position, but I want to go home now, so that's what you get. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Vop vs spell casting materials
Top