Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Vorpal vs fortification armor
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 2777519" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>The rules for miss chance state that the attacker rolls to hit first, then the defender rolls miss chance.</p><p></p><p>But, if the attacker actually makes his to hit roll, did he actually hit if the defender makes his miss chance roll?</p><p></p><p>NO, it does not mattter that he made a to hit roll.</p><p></p><p>The Attacker misses. It is not that he "sort of hit". He missed. Period.</p><p></p><p></p><p>That's what your argument here is like.</p><p></p><p>Did he critical?</p><p></p><p>NO, it does not matter that he made a critical hit roll.</p><p></p><p>Why? Because the armor protected against that.</p><p></p><p></p><p>We are not playing Magic the Gathering with a convulted set of "if this happens before that..." set of rules. It didn't actually happen. Just like a Sneak Attack against the armor didn't actually happen if the roll is made for the armor.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The defense prevented it from happening at all, exactly like a Miss chance does. The rules are identical here. The offense rolls. If they succeed, the defense rolls to see if they actually failed.</p><p></p><p></p><p>So yes, the roll can be made all you want. That still does not prevent the negation of the critical hit. It never happens if the defense prevents it, exactly like the Miss chance rules.</p><p></p><p></p><p>They had to write down some order to check this out, but this does not mean that something actually happens when a rule states that it is negated.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 2777519, member: 2011"] The rules for miss chance state that the attacker rolls to hit first, then the defender rolls miss chance. But, if the attacker actually makes his to hit roll, did he actually hit if the defender makes his miss chance roll? NO, it does not mattter that he made a to hit roll. The Attacker misses. It is not that he "sort of hit". He missed. Period. That's what your argument here is like. Did he critical? NO, it does not matter that he made a critical hit roll. Why? Because the armor protected against that. We are not playing Magic the Gathering with a convulted set of "if this happens before that..." set of rules. It didn't actually happen. Just like a Sneak Attack against the armor didn't actually happen if the roll is made for the armor. The defense prevented it from happening at all, exactly like a Miss chance does. The rules are identical here. The offense rolls. If they succeed, the defense rolls to see if they actually failed. So yes, the roll can be made all you want. That still does not prevent the negation of the critical hit. It never happens if the defense prevents it, exactly like the Miss chance rules. They had to write down some order to check this out, but this does not mean that something actually happens when a rule states that it is negated. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Vorpal vs fortification armor
Top