Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Vote Up a 5e-alike: Some quick thoughts on combat and armor...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Faolyn" data-source="post: 9186582" data-attributes="member: 6915329"><p>OK, I'm feeling brain-dead this morning (one of those days where I wish I hadn't given up caffeine), so lemme see if I got it. For the time being, I'm going to ignore the variable value based on weapon, at least until we've decided what those values are, and assume that the fixed value is 10. If I'm understanding this correctly, the GM won't be rolling for combat. Which is fine by me. </p><p></p><p>So let's assume two different Bad Guys here, so we can have a look at different power levels. A bandit is CR 1/8, has +3 to attack (+2 PB, +1 Str), and has AC 12 (+1 Dex, +1 leather). A Warlord is CR 12, has +9 to hit (+4 PB, +5 Str), and has AC 18 (plate armor, +3 Dex not included but might be important later).</p><p></p><p>The PC has an <strong>Attack Value</strong> of (10 + (PB +4) + (Str +5)) 19, and would need to roll under a 19 to hit? Which would make it <em>really darn easy to hit. </em> So I'm getting something wrong here. Or... Would it be 19 - the armor? Hitting the bandit would be (19 - 2) 17 or less, while hitting the warlord would be (19 - 8) 11 or less. If we assume a 1st-level PC with AV 15 (10 + (PB +2) + (Str +3). Against the bandit, they'd have to roll a (15 - 2 from leather) 13 or lower; against the warlord, they'd have to roll an 15 - 8 from plate) 7 or lower. These are base numbers and don't take any other bonuses, like Weapon Specialization or magical weapons, into consideration; all of these would increase the base AV up there.</p><p></p><p>These numbers seem more reasonable to me, but someone who is better at math than I am might want to run the numbers and see how this compares to 5e or other editions. It seems like you might be somewhat less likely to hit in this version.</p><p></p><p>The different weapon values, while possibly realistic, would likely be difficult to decide. A knife is good at getting past defenses but not so good at getting past armor, but a mace has a lot of force behind it that can push past a lot of defenses but might be more easily blocked, and so on. That said, I could see feats (or maneuvers) that are "Weapon Expert" where your knowledge with a particular weapon increases your attack value with it by 2 (and may be stackable, if you want to take the feat more than once), and certain the Weapon Specialization/Mastery abilities I gave to the fighter would increase the AV by even more.</p><p></p><p>Now onto defense. Would the <strong>Defense Value</strong> be based on the character or the foe? In other words, when we write up a creature's statblock, would it include their DV in it, or is this something that is entirely dependant on the PC? In D&D, almost all of your defensive ability is based on static AC, with only a very small number of things that alter that. In Level Up, a lot of weapons have the parrying quality, which means you get to add a d4 to your AC if you're wielding that weapon--but that list of weapons include things like quarterstaffs, so even a wizard can try to parry. </p><p></p><p>In other words, if the bandit is attacking me, do I need to roll against something on <em>their </em>sheet or on <em>my </em>sheet? </p><p></p><p>If it's on <em>their </em>sheet, then the DV should be based on their weapon skill. So a bandit's AV could be (X - 3), whereas the warlord's AV could be (X - 9). So is X a static number and if so, what?</p><p></p><p>If it's on <em>your </em>sheet, should it be based on your AC alone, your AC + things like parrying ability[1], or on a static number + your Dex, PB, and/or other things like shields, with armor being used as damage resistance?</p><p></p><p>Of if it's on your should, would it be based on a static number (your AC + whatever or your Dex + whatever) - their weapon skill, so if your DV ends up as a 15 (plain ol' chainmail alone) and the creature's DV is 3, when you roll to defend and you roll 11, you would say you made it by four and that means you beat their DV?</p><p></p><p>[1] In Level Up, certain weapons have the Parrying trait; 1/turn you can add a d4 to your AC. This includes quarterstaffs, so even your wimpy wizards can parry. In D&D, parrying seems to just be equal to your PB most of the time and is more a special ability than a weapon trait.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Faolyn, post: 9186582, member: 6915329"] OK, I'm feeling brain-dead this morning (one of those days where I wish I hadn't given up caffeine), so lemme see if I got it. For the time being, I'm going to ignore the variable value based on weapon, at least until we've decided what those values are, and assume that the fixed value is 10. If I'm understanding this correctly, the GM won't be rolling for combat. Which is fine by me. So let's assume two different Bad Guys here, so we can have a look at different power levels. A bandit is CR 1/8, has +3 to attack (+2 PB, +1 Str), and has AC 12 (+1 Dex, +1 leather). A Warlord is CR 12, has +9 to hit (+4 PB, +5 Str), and has AC 18 (plate armor, +3 Dex not included but might be important later). The PC has an [B]Attack Value[/B] of (10 + (PB +4) + (Str +5)) 19, and would need to roll under a 19 to hit? Which would make it [I]really darn easy to hit. [/I] So I'm getting something wrong here. Or... Would it be 19 - the armor? Hitting the bandit would be (19 - 2) 17 or less, while hitting the warlord would be (19 - 8) 11 or less. If we assume a 1st-level PC with AV 15 (10 + (PB +2) + (Str +3). Against the bandit, they'd have to roll a (15 - 2 from leather) 13 or lower; against the warlord, they'd have to roll an 15 - 8 from plate) 7 or lower. These are base numbers and don't take any other bonuses, like Weapon Specialization or magical weapons, into consideration; all of these would increase the base AV up there. These numbers seem more reasonable to me, but someone who is better at math than I am might want to run the numbers and see how this compares to 5e or other editions. It seems like you might be somewhat less likely to hit in this version. The different weapon values, while possibly realistic, would likely be difficult to decide. A knife is good at getting past defenses but not so good at getting past armor, but a mace has a lot of force behind it that can push past a lot of defenses but might be more easily blocked, and so on. That said, I could see feats (or maneuvers) that are "Weapon Expert" where your knowledge with a particular weapon increases your attack value with it by 2 (and may be stackable, if you want to take the feat more than once), and certain the Weapon Specialization/Mastery abilities I gave to the fighter would increase the AV by even more. Now onto defense. Would the [B]Defense Value[/B] be based on the character or the foe? In other words, when we write up a creature's statblock, would it include their DV in it, or is this something that is entirely dependant on the PC? In D&D, almost all of your defensive ability is based on static AC, with only a very small number of things that alter that. In Level Up, a lot of weapons have the parrying quality, which means you get to add a d4 to your AC if you're wielding that weapon--but that list of weapons include things like quarterstaffs, so even a wizard can try to parry. In other words, if the bandit is attacking me, do I need to roll against something on [I]their [/I]sheet or on [I]my [/I]sheet? If it's on [I]their [/I]sheet, then the DV should be based on their weapon skill. So a bandit's AV could be (X - 3), whereas the warlord's AV could be (X - 9). So is X a static number and if so, what? If it's on [I]your [/I]sheet, should it be based on your AC alone, your AC + things like parrying ability[1], or on a static number + your Dex, PB, and/or other things like shields, with armor being used as damage resistance? Of if it's on your should, would it be based on a static number (your AC + whatever or your Dex + whatever) - their weapon skill, so if your DV ends up as a 15 (plain ol' chainmail alone) and the creature's DV is 3, when you roll to defend and you roll 11, you would say you made it by four and that means you beat their DV? [1] In Level Up, certain weapons have the Parrying trait; 1/turn you can add a d4 to your AC. This includes quarterstaffs, so even your wimpy wizards can parry. In D&D, parrying seems to just be equal to your PB most of the time and is more a special ability than a weapon trait. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Vote Up a 5e-alike: Some quick thoughts on combat and armor...
Top