Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="RedTonic" data-source="post: 5514682" data-attributes="member: 98994">Honestly, I hadn't even thought about the possibility of the character carrying their share of the treasure. It seems like me that it's still the PC "owning" it (unless he's just carrying someone else's stuff) regardless of whether he uses it for his personal benefit. Otherwise, I think our perspectives are pretty much the same.I do agree with R-Hero, it's difficult to RP (especially if you were playing a kick-down-the-door type game) when the expectation is that you're going to be out there committing more or less wanton acts of violence. I think the vow of nonviolence/vow of peace feats work best for NPCs. While D&D can totally be run without combat, I don't believe the game is meant for that sort of play, and it's definitely not optimized for it. This player has set himself up for a challenge, and as I've never roleplayed with him before, I don't know how ready he is or isn't to meet it.At the very least, if the PC becomes unplayable in the campaign, I'll certainly let him roll up a new character equal in level, and he can retire this guy to a life of contemplation or something. And if the character dies, well... <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/devil.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":devil:" title="Devil    :devil:" data-shortname=":devil:" /></blockquote>