Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Wacky pseudo-Vancian casting sytem (long)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ainamacar" data-source="post: 5906770" data-attributes="member: 70709"><p>I don't think it's quite as bad you suggest. In particular, half the stuff in the OP's table is analysis, not information a player needs to make a character. Unless I've missed something really big, the amount of stuff to track in my example is slightly higher than 3.5 below level 10, about equal near level 10, and less than 3.5 above level 10. Of course, if you think 3.5 wizards had too much tracking anyway, I'll have to concede point. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Ignoring cantrips, a typical level 10 3.5 wizard will have about 20 spell slots (including bonus slots), or 25 if a specialist. That entails keeping track of 20-25 pieces of information, namely what spells are prepared. Spells prepared multiple times reduce that burden because one can simply note how many times an individual spell is prepared, but in my experience wizards that frequently prepare the same spells over and over are usually called sorcerers. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p>Now, in my sample spell progression the 10th level caster will have 10 stacks, 2 of each level up to 5. Each stack requires two pieces of information to be fully determined: The level of the stack associated with a given spell, and the lowest spell slot that has not yet been cast. So this will always be 20 pieces of information to track.</p><p></p><p>Maybe to make it clearer, suppose the spell sheet looked something like this (for the sake of argument please assume all of these spells have level 1-5 versions.):</p><p>[code]</p><p>(Let the blank define that no spell slots remain.)</p><p>Min</p><p>Slot Stack Spell</p><p>1 1 Alarm</p><p>4 5 Charm Person</p><p> 1 Comprehend Languages</p><p>2 4 Dimension Door</p><p> 2 Disguise Self</p><p>4 4 Dispel Magic</p><p>1 3 Fireball</p><p> 3 Haste</p><p>2 5 Magic Missile</p><p> 2 Stone Skin</p><p></p><p>Or in an equivalent format that shows the unused slots explicitly</p><p>as "o"s (perhaps a filled circle on a character sheet) and a bar</p><p>which cuts off the available slots after the stack level:</p><p>Level</p><p>123456789 Spell</p><p>o| Alarm</p><p> oo| Charm Person</p><p> | Comprehend Languages</p><p> ooo| Dimension Door</p><p> | Disguise Self</p><p> o| Dispel Magic</p><p>ooo| Fireball</p><p> | Haste</p><p> oooo| Magic Missile</p><p> | Stone Skin</p><p>[/code]This character has already cast the maximum level of the spell for Comprehend Languages, Disguise Self, Haste, and Stone Skin. Thus far this character has not cast Fireball, so all its slots are available. Its best spells are Charm Person and Magic Missile, and the character can tell at a glance what levels of each can still be cast. If the character decided to cast a 4th level Magic Missile on its next turn then on the first spell sheet one simply change 1 to 5 in the appropriate column, while on the 2nd sheet one could "erase" the first three "o"s.</p><p></p><p>I'm sure there are better presentations possible, but although the information itself is unfamiliar, the volume isn't that large.</p><p></p><p>Cheers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ainamacar, post: 5906770, member: 70709"] I don't think it's quite as bad you suggest. In particular, half the stuff in the OP's table is analysis, not information a player needs to make a character. Unless I've missed something really big, the amount of stuff to track in my example is slightly higher than 3.5 below level 10, about equal near level 10, and less than 3.5 above level 10. Of course, if you think 3.5 wizards had too much tracking anyway, I'll have to concede point. :) Ignoring cantrips, a typical level 10 3.5 wizard will have about 20 spell slots (including bonus slots), or 25 if a specialist. That entails keeping track of 20-25 pieces of information, namely what spells are prepared. Spells prepared multiple times reduce that burden because one can simply note how many times an individual spell is prepared, but in my experience wizards that frequently prepare the same spells over and over are usually called sorcerers. :p Now, in my sample spell progression the 10th level caster will have 10 stacks, 2 of each level up to 5. Each stack requires two pieces of information to be fully determined: The level of the stack associated with a given spell, and the lowest spell slot that has not yet been cast. So this will always be 20 pieces of information to track. Maybe to make it clearer, suppose the spell sheet looked something like this (for the sake of argument please assume all of these spells have level 1-5 versions.): [code] (Let the blank define that no spell slots remain.) Min Slot Stack Spell 1 1 Alarm 4 5 Charm Person 1 Comprehend Languages 2 4 Dimension Door 2 Disguise Self 4 4 Dispel Magic 1 3 Fireball 3 Haste 2 5 Magic Missile 2 Stone Skin Or in an equivalent format that shows the unused slots explicitly as "o"s (perhaps a filled circle on a character sheet) and a bar which cuts off the available slots after the stack level: Level 123456789 Spell o| Alarm oo| Charm Person | Comprehend Languages ooo| Dimension Door | Disguise Self o| Dispel Magic ooo| Fireball | Haste oooo| Magic Missile | Stone Skin [/code]This character has already cast the maximum level of the spell for Comprehend Languages, Disguise Self, Haste, and Stone Skin. Thus far this character has not cast Fireball, so all its slots are available. Its best spells are Charm Person and Magic Missile, and the character can tell at a glance what levels of each can still be cast. If the character decided to cast a 4th level Magic Missile on its next turn then on the first spell sheet one simply change 1 to 5 in the appropriate column, while on the 2nd sheet one could "erase" the first three "o"s. I'm sure there are better presentations possible, but although the information itself is unfamiliar, the volume isn't that large. Cheers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Wacky pseudo-Vancian casting sytem (long)
Top