Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Wall of Thorns vs. a red dragon: did we do this right?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pielorinho" data-source="post: 950370" data-attributes="member: 259"><p>I completely agree with you about his tone, and want to distance myself from it. <strong>Neither</strong> of us has much experience with fifth level spells. Just as I get freaked when I see Righteous Might in action, you get shocked & appalled when you see Wall of Thorns come into play. They're powerful, but we're both learning how powerful.</p><p></p><p>That said, I see only a few of the things you described as being advantageous:</p><p></p><p>1) Damage to large groups: true, although the damage is frankly minor. Monks, poor little fleshbags with no natural or manufactured armor, are the perfect targets for the spell; most other creatures will find that their armor negates most of the damage, if not all of it.</p><p>2) Trapping a 30x30 area: true. The AoE is bigger.</p><p>3) Casting spells at people in it: this isn't an advantage, because line of effect goes both ways. Bad guys can cast spells at me, too. Indeed, because wall of thorns DOESN'T change LoE, it's less useful in terms of being able to alter the battlefield, I'd say.</p><p>4) Shooting people in it: same as above.</p><p>5) Duration: a very minor benefit. In none of the times I've cast it has the 10 minutes/level instead of 1 minute/level made a difference, and the vast majority of the time, this is true.</p><p>6) Durability: this is one that I think should change. I'd suggest it should have a lower hardness but more hit points than the other damageable wall spells.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, it's the only real wall spell that doesn't block LoE. It's the only one that can be dispelled. It's the only one that can be damaged by fire (at least, I'd assume that you can't burn down a stone wall: the rules leave this to the DM's judgement). Wall of force can trap people without allowing a saving throw, and they cannot get out without a burrowing speed or teleportation magics. </p><p></p><p>I do think it's powerful, but I think it's on par with the other wall spells (note that we've only seen one other wall spell in use in our game, and that wasn't in combat). Nerfing it the way you suggest makes it, I believe, far less useful than other fifth level spells, and leaves the druid's spell list without any all-purpose useful combat spells (besides Summon Nature's Ally and Animal Growth, which for other reasons we're trying to avoid in our campaign).</p><p></p><p>Daniel</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pielorinho, post: 950370, member: 259"] I completely agree with you about his tone, and want to distance myself from it. [b]Neither[/b] of us has much experience with fifth level spells. Just as I get freaked when I see Righteous Might in action, you get shocked & appalled when you see Wall of Thorns come into play. They're powerful, but we're both learning how powerful. That said, I see only a few of the things you described as being advantageous: 1) Damage to large groups: true, although the damage is frankly minor. Monks, poor little fleshbags with no natural or manufactured armor, are the perfect targets for the spell; most other creatures will find that their armor negates most of the damage, if not all of it. 2) Trapping a 30x30 area: true. The AoE is bigger. 3) Casting spells at people in it: this isn't an advantage, because line of effect goes both ways. Bad guys can cast spells at me, too. Indeed, because wall of thorns DOESN'T change LoE, it's less useful in terms of being able to alter the battlefield, I'd say. 4) Shooting people in it: same as above. 5) Duration: a very minor benefit. In none of the times I've cast it has the 10 minutes/level instead of 1 minute/level made a difference, and the vast majority of the time, this is true. 6) Durability: this is one that I think should change. I'd suggest it should have a lower hardness but more hit points than the other damageable wall spells. On the other hand, it's the only real wall spell that doesn't block LoE. It's the only one that can be dispelled. It's the only one that can be damaged by fire (at least, I'd assume that you can't burn down a stone wall: the rules leave this to the DM's judgement). Wall of force can trap people without allowing a saving throw, and they cannot get out without a burrowing speed or teleportation magics. I do think it's powerful, but I think it's on par with the other wall spells (note that we've only seen one other wall spell in use in our game, and that wasn't in combat). Nerfing it the way you suggest makes it, I believe, far less useful than other fifth level spells, and leaves the druid's spell list without any all-purpose useful combat spells (besides Summon Nature's Ally and Animal Growth, which for other reasons we're trying to avoid in our campaign). Daniel [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Wall of Thorns vs. a red dragon: did we do this right?
Top