Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Wandering Monsters: Morons and Salads
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 6120310" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>I grant you that they aren't often treated well. However, the rogue modron party member in 'Planescape: Torment' was pretty cool.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>These things don't have to be completely mutually exclusive.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And these things are definately not mutually exclusive. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, I have tried to do that. If I can't sell you on them, well I can't sell you on them.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I've always liked the vaguely frogish race of alien beings, first because I saw them as a really well designed foe and one of the few foes really capable of taking on a high level party, second because Ygorl and Ssendam were (aside from slightly corny names) really cool, and thirdly because I consider CN one of the consistantly worst done alignments in the game and I've endeavored to make it more interesting and more coherent than it usually is. I probably wouldn't have started with Slaad if I was working from scratch, but it was what we had. I don't necessarily consider them any worse of a starting point than any alternative that has been proposed, and they are certainly a more familiar one. If you've read the link in my sig, you can tell I'm retconning quite a bit that has been expanded on them officially by other people, and that I'm adapting them by way of elaboration into something closer to what I think they should have been from the beginning. Some 'problems' though with the Slaad are inherent to trying to record and systematize the 'monster' into a rules framework. Technically of course, it would be better if they were outside the rules, as any codification of them is 'wrong' for thier nature. But, as a practical matter it works better to codifiy them, and with that comes heirarchies and taxonomies and over simplification. I have some ideas for fixing that, but I don't mind that as a starting point.</p><p></p><p>Of course, I understand that they aren't everyone's cup of tea. Other things other people get really into, I don't have the slightest interest in nor do always see why they would.</p><p></p><p>And in any event, I would be quite happy to not include any outsiders in the 1st MM save for those few that get mentioned in the PH rules text (possible familiars, summonable creatures, etc.). The vast bulk of them can be in a Planar expansion. The entire planar cosmology is after all optional source material. There is no reason you have to assume any of it exists.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 6120310, member: 4937"] I grant you that they aren't often treated well. However, the rogue modron party member in 'Planescape: Torment' was pretty cool. These things don't have to be completely mutually exclusive. And these things are definately not mutually exclusive. Well, I have tried to do that. If I can't sell you on them, well I can't sell you on them. Personally, I've always liked the vaguely frogish race of alien beings, first because I saw them as a really well designed foe and one of the few foes really capable of taking on a high level party, second because Ygorl and Ssendam were (aside from slightly corny names) really cool, and thirdly because I consider CN one of the consistantly worst done alignments in the game and I've endeavored to make it more interesting and more coherent than it usually is. I probably wouldn't have started with Slaad if I was working from scratch, but it was what we had. I don't necessarily consider them any worse of a starting point than any alternative that has been proposed, and they are certainly a more familiar one. If you've read the link in my sig, you can tell I'm retconning quite a bit that has been expanded on them officially by other people, and that I'm adapting them by way of elaboration into something closer to what I think they should have been from the beginning. Some 'problems' though with the Slaad are inherent to trying to record and systematize the 'monster' into a rules framework. Technically of course, it would be better if they were outside the rules, as any codification of them is 'wrong' for thier nature. But, as a practical matter it works better to codifiy them, and with that comes heirarchies and taxonomies and over simplification. I have some ideas for fixing that, but I don't mind that as a starting point. Of course, I understand that they aren't everyone's cup of tea. Other things other people get really into, I don't have the slightest interest in nor do always see why they would. And in any event, I would be quite happy to not include any outsiders in the 1st MM save for those few that get mentioned in the PH rules text (possible familiars, summonable creatures, etc.). The vast bulk of them can be in a Planar expansion. The entire planar cosmology is after all optional source material. There is no reason you have to assume any of it exists. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Wandering Monsters: Morons and Salads
Top