Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Wandering Monsters- playable monsters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tovec" data-source="post: 6152566" data-attributes="member: 95493"><p>I know! None were satisfactory, at all.</p><p></p><p>I think Pathfinder actually has my favourite solution so far, though I think it needs work. The remaining problems probably have to do with the CR system and backwards comparability.</p><p></p><p>So, my ideal solution would resemble something like.. level adjustment to enter, then possibly reducing that adjustment (gaining back those lost levels in some way) as you advance further. If you do this, you can let nearly ALL monsters be characters, assuming the adjustment comes in high enough. And that is what I need, I have had a wide range of monster PCs and I would hate to lose that club in my bag of tricks. Most people won't be, but that doesn't mean that I should not be allowed the option.</p><p></p><p>Beyond that however, I've had excellent experiences with Ogre PCs, TERRIBLE experiences with Pixies (mostly due to one specific player) and I don't consider the stock humanoids (aasimar, orc, etc.) to be any different than regular PCs. I haven't had anyone (yet) who was high enough to be able to be a true dragon, but I have had several express interest and a few come close and I absolutely want them to be playable in the future - my preferred system already does that and the system I am developing does that, I would be amazed if WotC can't figure out a way. My game would absolutely suffer if they limit it to only humanoids and not expand it as far as possible.</p><p></p><p>Oh, and weak versions of monsters <em>CAN </em>work, but I have not seen it ever work in reality. It always feels very much like a weak form of that creature. Play a weak angel and you feel it as soon as you encounter a real one, any fiend, or really any outsider at all. I don't like having only some of the powers that I feel are iconic to a creature<span style="font-size: 10px">*</span>.</p><p></p><p>Also, unless I'm crazy, it seems like a partial solution for this 'weak form' of a monster might be to let PCs play the 'Half' version. It isn't enough for my preferences, but it is something and does allow a partial measure without feeling, unjustifiably IMHO, watered down. That is, if you want to play a ogre but it is too strong then play a half-ogre. Want to be draconic, half-dragon. Want to be a celestial but the real ones have too many powers? Half-celestial. It can even work with what Wyatt was saying about large creatures being too powerful, as half-creatures could all (by design) end up all being medium (possibly small). They don't even have to be a template (as it was in 3e) they could just be a stock race. Not half-dragon-half-human; just half-dragon. Period.</p><p></p><p>Also, does anyone else find it funny that we got an article like this AFTER the shadar-kai? I mean, given the percentages and the conversation we had when the shadar-kai article did come out; I would assume monster PCs are more popular.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 9px"><span style="font-size: 10px">*</span>If they are not iconic then why does a "fully formed" version of that creature exist, and why with that exact set of powers?</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tovec, post: 6152566, member: 95493"] I know! None were satisfactory, at all. I think Pathfinder actually has my favourite solution so far, though I think it needs work. The remaining problems probably have to do with the CR system and backwards comparability. So, my ideal solution would resemble something like.. level adjustment to enter, then possibly reducing that adjustment (gaining back those lost levels in some way) as you advance further. If you do this, you can let nearly ALL monsters be characters, assuming the adjustment comes in high enough. And that is what I need, I have had a wide range of monster PCs and I would hate to lose that club in my bag of tricks. Most people won't be, but that doesn't mean that I should not be allowed the option. Beyond that however, I've had excellent experiences with Ogre PCs, TERRIBLE experiences with Pixies (mostly due to one specific player) and I don't consider the stock humanoids (aasimar, orc, etc.) to be any different than regular PCs. I haven't had anyone (yet) who was high enough to be able to be a true dragon, but I have had several express interest and a few come close and I absolutely want them to be playable in the future - my preferred system already does that and the system I am developing does that, I would be amazed if WotC can't figure out a way. My game would absolutely suffer if they limit it to only humanoids and not expand it as far as possible. Oh, and weak versions of monsters [I]CAN [/I]work, but I have not seen it ever work in reality. It always feels very much like a weak form of that creature. Play a weak angel and you feel it as soon as you encounter a real one, any fiend, or really any outsider at all. I don't like having only some of the powers that I feel are iconic to a creature[SIZE=2]*[/SIZE]. Also, unless I'm crazy, it seems like a partial solution for this 'weak form' of a monster might be to let PCs play the 'Half' version. It isn't enough for my preferences, but it is something and does allow a partial measure without feeling, unjustifiably IMHO, watered down. That is, if you want to play a ogre but it is too strong then play a half-ogre. Want to be draconic, half-dragon. Want to be a celestial but the real ones have too many powers? Half-celestial. It can even work with what Wyatt was saying about large creatures being too powerful, as half-creatures could all (by design) end up all being medium (possibly small). They don't even have to be a template (as it was in 3e) they could just be a stock race. Not half-dragon-half-human; just half-dragon. Period. Also, does anyone else find it funny that we got an article like this AFTER the shadar-kai? I mean, given the percentages and the conversation we had when the shadar-kai article did come out; I would assume monster PCs are more popular. [SIZE=1][SIZE=2]*[/SIZE]If they are not iconic then why does a "fully formed" version of that creature exist, and why with that exact set of powers?[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Wandering Monsters- playable monsters
Top