Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Wandering Monsters: Rosemary's Baby
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alzrius" data-source="post: 6184866" data-attributes="member: 8461"><p>If you go to the WotC page where the actual polling on this issue is taking place, it's just another online poll - there's no login mechanism there to stop repeat voting. There's certainly nothing to weight the data. It's just another online poll.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You're ignoring what I pointed out - if you want to set their type by their thematic element, they're much more like demons than devils. Now, you can just change any monster to "make it choose to work for everyone," but that's beside the point. The point is that they're a much better fit for where they already were in the first place.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This reasoning is predicated on the idea of "well they could choose to act differently, so why not rewrite them based on that?" The problem with this idea is that it postulates that they <em>could</em> have a motivation, and then says that since that reasoning isn't explicitly denied, it's just as valid as what <em>is</em> explicitly stated.</p><p></p><p>Leaving aside that a lack of a denial isn't the same as an affirmation, this reasoning can be applied to anything. One could say that a pit fiend might want to destroy the enemies of Hell entirely, allowing for greater subjugation among the remaining mortals, etc. and that it depends on the individual pit fiend in question, whether based out of hatred for mortals, personal ambition, orders from higher-ups, etc. and that this individuality of motives is a chaotic quality, and so they're better off as demons. Which is ridiculous.</p><p></p><p>The basic thematic differences between demons and devils (e.g. destruction versus corruption) are what they do, not why they do it. Playing to questions of motives is avoiding that issue, not reconciling it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I do too, that's the point. Devils have rigid "promotions" as part of their hierarchy; demons just change into stronger forms in no particular order, without set criteria for advancement. A demon isn't going to be worried about a promotion, per se. It's just going to want to gain more personal power, since that's all the better to causing havoc. A relatively weak demon like a succubus is (in my opinion) going to want to gain more power (which means changing forms) so it can stop pussy-footing around (see what I did there?) and get to a place where it's strong enough to level entire cities by itself.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alzrius, post: 6184866, member: 8461"] If you go to the WotC page where the actual polling on this issue is taking place, it's just another online poll - there's no login mechanism there to stop repeat voting. There's certainly nothing to weight the data. It's just another online poll. You're ignoring what I pointed out - if you want to set their type by their thematic element, they're much more like demons than devils. Now, you can just change any monster to "make it choose to work for everyone," but that's beside the point. The point is that they're a much better fit for where they already were in the first place. This reasoning is predicated on the idea of "well they could choose to act differently, so why not rewrite them based on that?" The problem with this idea is that it postulates that they [i]could[/i] have a motivation, and then says that since that reasoning isn't explicitly denied, it's just as valid as what [i]is[/i] explicitly stated. Leaving aside that a lack of a denial isn't the same as an affirmation, this reasoning can be applied to anything. One could say that a pit fiend might want to destroy the enemies of Hell entirely, allowing for greater subjugation among the remaining mortals, etc. and that it depends on the individual pit fiend in question, whether based out of hatred for mortals, personal ambition, orders from higher-ups, etc. and that this individuality of motives is a chaotic quality, and so they're better off as demons. Which is ridiculous. The basic thematic differences between demons and devils (e.g. destruction versus corruption) are what they do, not why they do it. Playing to questions of motives is avoiding that issue, not reconciling it. I do too, that's the point. Devils have rigid "promotions" as part of their hierarchy; demons just change into stronger forms in no particular order, without set criteria for advancement. A demon isn't going to be worried about a promotion, per se. It's just going to want to gain more personal power, since that's all the better to causing havoc. A relatively weak demon like a succubus is (in my opinion) going to want to gain more power (which means changing forms) so it can stop pussy-footing around (see what I did there?) and get to a place where it's strong enough to level entire cities by itself. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Wandering Monsters: Rosemary's Baby
Top