Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Wandering Monsters: Tiers of Play
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Keldryn" data-source="post: 6257017" data-attributes="member: 11999"><p>I've always loved the overall structure of BECMI D&D. AD&D implied a similar progression from dungeon crawling to wilderness adventures to building strongholds and establishing a territory. BECMI just made that framework more explicit and expanded it to encompass the quest for immortality (the focus of Set 4: Master Rules). There were certainly flaws in the implementation, but I still think the idea is very sound.</p><p></p><p>X1 Isle of Dread (levels 4-7) and B10 Night's Dark Terror (levels 2-4) are both great examples of how the focus on wilderness exploration dramatically changes the gameplay experience from "dungeon crawling from one encounter to the next."</p><p></p><p>Many higher-level adventures from the TSR era still ended up being of the "visit a site and fight monsters" variety, but there are three that still stand out to me today as providing an example of how high level D&D could play out:</p><p></p><p>X10 Red Arrow, Black Shield (levels 10-14) featured an invasion of the "Known World" nations by the Master of the Desert Nomads. The war is not simply a background plot in this adventure, but is played out on the map using the War Machine rules. Each of the nations has the potential to side with either the Master or oppose him, depending on the PCs' actions. The adventure plays out over the course of many months as the war progresses, and in the end the political map will likely be very different. </p><p></p><p>CM1 Test of the Warlords (levels 25+) showcases the domain rules of the Companion Set. A new king has established himself in a land north of the "Known World" that has until now been unclaimed. The PCs can pledge allegiance to this new king and establish their own dominions in this untamed land. The module is a loose framework that features a number of events that take place over the span of several years, including potentially wedding one of the PCs to the new king.</p><p></p><p>M5 Talons of Night (levels 20-25) has the PCs traveling between worlds (including a cubic world, and another one that is a tiny toy version of their own), leading armies into battle, and ultimately negotiating peace between the world's two most powerful empires (or failing, plunging the world into a massive war).</p><p></p><p>Both X10 and CM1 need a lot of fleshing out to make them playable, and each contains scenarios that are very contrived or implausible. But they provide great frameworks for paragon-tier campaign arcs. All three are good examples of adventures with higher stakes that don't simply focus on fighting tougher monsters in more dangerous locales.</p><p></p><p>It was this overall campaign structure of BECMI that I was really hoping to see in 4e when they were first talking about the three tiers of play. I love the idea of the heroic/paragon/epic structure and how each tier would have a visible effect on how the game played. I love the idea of saving much of the world-affecting magic for the paragon and epic tiers. I love the idea of paragon paths and epic destinies that reinforced your characters' roles in the narrative. It sounded like a more structured and refined take on BECMI.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Keldryn, post: 6257017, member: 11999"] I've always loved the overall structure of BECMI D&D. AD&D implied a similar progression from dungeon crawling to wilderness adventures to building strongholds and establishing a territory. BECMI just made that framework more explicit and expanded it to encompass the quest for immortality (the focus of Set 4: Master Rules). There were certainly flaws in the implementation, but I still think the idea is very sound. X1 Isle of Dread (levels 4-7) and B10 Night's Dark Terror (levels 2-4) are both great examples of how the focus on wilderness exploration dramatically changes the gameplay experience from "dungeon crawling from one encounter to the next." Many higher-level adventures from the TSR era still ended up being of the "visit a site and fight monsters" variety, but there are three that still stand out to me today as providing an example of how high level D&D could play out: X10 Red Arrow, Black Shield (levels 10-14) featured an invasion of the "Known World" nations by the Master of the Desert Nomads. The war is not simply a background plot in this adventure, but is played out on the map using the War Machine rules. Each of the nations has the potential to side with either the Master or oppose him, depending on the PCs' actions. The adventure plays out over the course of many months as the war progresses, and in the end the political map will likely be very different. CM1 Test of the Warlords (levels 25+) showcases the domain rules of the Companion Set. A new king has established himself in a land north of the "Known World" that has until now been unclaimed. The PCs can pledge allegiance to this new king and establish their own dominions in this untamed land. The module is a loose framework that features a number of events that take place over the span of several years, including potentially wedding one of the PCs to the new king. M5 Talons of Night (levels 20-25) has the PCs traveling between worlds (including a cubic world, and another one that is a tiny toy version of their own), leading armies into battle, and ultimately negotiating peace between the world's two most powerful empires (or failing, plunging the world into a massive war). Both X10 and CM1 need a lot of fleshing out to make them playable, and each contains scenarios that are very contrived or implausible. But they provide great frameworks for paragon-tier campaign arcs. All three are good examples of adventures with higher stakes that don't simply focus on fighting tougher monsters in more dangerous locales. It was this overall campaign structure of BECMI that I was really hoping to see in 4e when they were first talking about the three tiers of play. I love the idea of the heroic/paragon/epic structure and how each tier would have a visible effect on how the game played. I love the idea of saving much of the world-affecting magic for the paragon and epic tiers. I love the idea of paragon paths and epic destinies that reinforced your characters' roles in the narrative. It sounded like a more structured and refined take on BECMI. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Wandering Monsters: Tiers of Play
Top